Re: Marge -- new cartoon
From James Mitchelhill <azi...@tcp.co.unitedkingdom>
· alt.ascii-art
· 14 Feb 1999 00:00 · View full thread
· report
On Sun, 14 Feb 1999 12:57:41 +0100, Veronica Karlsson <dre...@on.spammer> wrote: >JRO wrote: >> James Mitchelhill wrote: >> >Well, yes, all good and well if you're going to be completely gramtical >> >about it, but speech doesn't really work that gramatically, and tone of >> >voice can reverse the meaning.. >> > >> >Artists (in this case JRO) are often too 'close', intellectually or >> >emotionally to their creations to be able to spot mistakes, oversights, >> >or just other points of view. >> > >> Your point about spoken speech is kerrect. Most people do talk just like >> I captioned, which is how things are. My appologies for Americanisms invading >> your side of the pond. >> >Bullshit! It's just plain WRONG! It has NOTHING to do with "grammar". It >has NOTHING to do with "artistic freedom". It has to do with _logic_. >The people who say "I could care less" never stopped to think about what >it is they are _actually saying_. It's not logical precisely because the people never stopped to think about what they were saying. Generally, in conversational speech, people don't, mainly because they simply don't have time to. The average gap between speaking 'turns' in conversation is a lot less than a second. So people are either speaking or listening for almost all the time. However, the conversation doesn't have to be logical in order to be successful; the purpose of conversation is generally to open and maintain relationships, and to express feelings and opinions. The words are just the mechanism used to do this. Getting it 'wrong' isn't detrimental to the conversation generally. >There's a similar case in Swedish. Lots of people say "everybody is not >here yet", when what they really mean to say is "not everybody is here >yet" (the first version means "nobody is here yet", the second means "at >least one person is not here yet", BIG difference!). Sure, you know what >they mean, from the situation, and because it's often said that way, but >it's still WRONG! If you understand what it means, why does it matter? Anybody speaking is attempting to communicate an idea, and if the idea is understood, then the communication has, by definition, been successful. The choice between using the formal or informal version of a saying communicates more information about the person (ie. the level of formality in their relationship to their intended audience) than if they limited themself to the formal version. ObAscii: .=-''--._________ # '-. _________#_____________ '. .--|-----------------------|--. '. .:' _.-._ <- > < -> _.-._ ':. .: .'_|^|_'.<- > < - > .' (B) '. :. : :|_ o _|: .:' :(A) (D): : : '. |v| .' .:' '. (C) .' : '. '-.-' PCpropad4 '-.-' .' jim-=._____,=------------=._____.=-' -- #######################################################################. ####' : '#### James Mitchelhill azi...@tcp.co.unitedkingdom #| ##' '.:.' '## #| #:----+----:# "He tapped the Solar God on the shoulder. #| ##. .':'. .## `Hey, sunshine?'" #| ####. : .#### #| ######################Terry Pratchett#########Small Gods###############|
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,8cb1590a88e22b7c X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: azi...@tcp.co.unitedkingdom (James Mitchelhill) Subject: Re: Marge -- new cartoon Date: 1999/02/14 Message-ID: <36c...@news.tcp.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 444341910 References: <36c4aada.0@206.103.97.91> <36C...@iNOdirect.ca> <36c5679a.0@206.103.97.91> <36C...@bcpl.net> <36c...@news.tcp.co.uk> <36c637dc.0@206.103.97.91> <36C...@on.spammer> X-Complaints-To: abu...@tcp.net.uk X-Trace: news.tcp.co.uk 919019818 195.80.1.89 (Sun, 14 Feb 1999 19:16:58 BST) Organization: Total Connectivity Providers NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Feb 1999 19:16:58 BST Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1999 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.