Talk/Line: Sword
From David Stevenson <ad1...@freenet.unbc.edu>
· rec.arts.ascii
· 13 Nov 1994 23:17 · View full thread
· report
In a previous article, bra...@wfu.edu (jon larr branham) says: > >hi...I've been working on a sword, but I'm having problems with the tip >(point). Any suggestions? Thanks. >--jon > > / > <\______________ ||----------------------------------- ><= CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC| }=============================-------> > </ ||----------------------------------- > \ > Would a broadsword be acceptable? / ___________________________________ <\______________ || \ <= CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC| }=============================-------> </ ||____________________________________/ \ -- David Stevenson (604) 564-5695 ad1...@freenet.unbc.edu
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,3150eb4f1810a6a4 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-11-13 22:14:08 PST Path: bga.com!news.sprintlink.net!sashimi.wwa.com!not-for-mail From: ad1...@freenet.unbc.edu (David Stevenson) Newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii Subject: Talk/Line: Sword Date: 13 Nov 1994 17:17:04 -0600 Organization: P.G. Free-Net Association Lines: 27 Sender: bob...@wwa.com Approved: bob...@wwa.com Message-ID: <3a66pg$co...@gagme.wwa.com> References: <39qtfu$de...@gagme.wwa.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: gagme.wwa.com
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
rec.arts.ascii
in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.