Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 28 Feb 2002.
Re: Unattributed Ascii-Art?

Re: Unattributed Ascii-Art?

To Sum Up: As They Say in "The Phantom" Comics, "For Those Who Came In
Late..."

Since I started this thread and there may be (hopefully) a good amount of
discussion, I'll offer to serve as "secretary" and periodically post a
summary of the discussion thus far.

On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 18:33:44 GMT, mew...@softhome.net (JamesDad) wrote:
>I want to respect your work, and I do keep your initials on any ascii-art
>I reuse. However, sometimes I use a piece of ascii-art that had no
>attribution on it when I got it, such as this hug (which I did diddle to
>include my glasses and beard);
>
>       ___                 .~~~~ .                 ___
>  ____(   \              /________\               /   )____
> (____     \_____       / |(@||@)| \       ______/     ____)
>(____ A HUG FOR U`-----(      >     )-----'A HUG FOR U ____)
> (____     _____________@@  .___. @@______________     ____)
>   (______/             @@@.____.@@@              \______)
>                         @@@@@@@@@@
>                          @@@@@@@@
>
>  (View this in a monospaced font like Courier New or else 
>      you'll think this is a Picasso instead of a hug!)
>
>Has there ever been a discussion of a simple way to indicate that a piece
>of ascii-art is from an unknown source? The FAQ states, "If an ASCII ART
>picture doesn't have initials on it, mention that you didn't draw it when
>posting it". Could there (as a simple alternative) be a standard code or
>initials to do that instead? I know I'm not going to be putting "I didn't
>draw this and don't know who did" every time I use a piece of
>unattributed ascii art. Things I was thinking about might include:
>
> UNK : UNKnown source.
> #AU# : Artist unknown. The "#" characters would highlight that it was >
>      not someone with the initials "AU" who did the artwork.
> *U* : again, Unknown source.
> #NBM# : Not By Me
> UNATTR : UNATTRibuted; artist unknown.

On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 19:13:13 GMT, ast...@lastfuture.de (Peter
-lastfuture- Marquardt) added:

> this sure is a great idea... i kinda like it.. not your particular
> suggestions but the idea of marking unattributed ascii art to
> distinguish it from "self made free for use" ascii art :)
<SNIP>
> i think there will be discussed about it and maybe a new standard will
> emerge :) it's definitely a thing to spend some thought on

mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) put in his two cents' worth in on
28 Feb 2002 02:52:15 GMT;

> hmm I do like  -=NBM=-  (not by me) or -UNK- though either *could* be a
> sig too.

> OBASCII: Respect (Tomb of the Unknown ASCII Artist)

(very appropriate, Mike; your OBASCII was unattributed)

On Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:04:08 GMT, mew...@softhome.net (JamesDad) got back
into the act:

> We could even set a date (say, May 1--I thought about April 1 but since
> that's April Fool's Day...) to give someone time to speak up and say "I
> use that already!" or "I know someone who uses that one!" After the date
> chosen, it would BE the alt.ascii-art indicator for unattributed 
> ascii-art, and it would be up to the artist to change his/her form of 
> attributing their artwork to avoid confusion. Four or more letters could
> minimize that risk, too;

> ^QAA-A^ = "Query Alt.Ascii-Art" to find the artist.
> *RHIUDT* = "Raise Hand If You Did This"
> !ANSU! = "Attribution Needed: Speak Up!"
> +AUSU+ = "Artist Unknown: Speak Up!"
> ?DUDT? = "Did U Do This?" 
> ~IRAAAU~ = "I Respect Ascii-Artists: Artist Unknown"
> (FISAU) = "Fill In Space: Artist Unknown"

> ...putting symbols before and after the letters could help highlight 
> that the letters...are an indicator that the letters relate to the clip 
> being unattributed.

> Or the indicator could be all symbols;
> [***] = Like a password field; it's unknown what's behind the asterisks.

> I'm not as concerned about WHAT the indicator is...as I am that there BE
> one; simple and easy to remember...

> OBUASCII: (OBligatory Unattributed ASCII art) Bill the Cat as a Bat

BTW, Hope you like my "Picasso" footer to my ASCII-Art postings; I think
it *has* minimized some confusion.

I had another thought along similar lines to float; with all the diddling
that goes on, someone with a good diddle of another's original should be
given credit too. Take the example I gave of my crude effort at making a
"James Report" header (see my first post). Proper credit could be given by
an initial set like MW/jgs. I don't think putting EVERY diddler would
work; sigs as big as the artwork (MW/jgs/VK/MGP/LV/aa/lgb/SO would be
getting ridiculous), just the most recent diddler (and MAYBE a
particularly exceptional intermediate diddler) would suffice. So
MW/jgs/VK/MGP/LV/aa/lgb/SO would simply be MW/SO. I offer this for your
consideration as well.

OBUASCII: (Extended ASCII-art from my BBS days, converted with 7bit)

+------------------------------+
|People who accuse Christians  |
|of being "Bible Bangers" are  |
|usually far more intolerant   |          ################
|than the people they accuse   |        #####################
|of intolerance. Plus, they    |     #########################
|usually haven't read the book.|    #########   ##############
|  +---------------------------+   ############ # ###############
|  |                          ###############   #################
|  +-------+      ###############################################
+----------+   #################################################
                                       ########################
                                              ##################
                                              ###############
                                            #################
                                           ###############
                                          ################
                                        #################
                                      ###################
                                   ######################
 
==================================================
WASUP! Teaches Zoology:
What did the fish say when he hit a concrete wall?
Dam!
==================================================

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,138eebc638a5f8df
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2002-02-28 05:46:37 PST
Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!netnews.com!xfer02.netnews.com!newsfeed1.cidera.com!Cidera!news1.atlantic.net!not-for-mail
From: mew...@softhome.net (JamesDad)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: Unattributed Ascii-Art?
Organization: Not a Heck of a Lot
Message-ID: <3c7...@news.atlantic.net>
References: <3c7...@news.mpinet.net>
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/16.243
Lines: 133
Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 13:46:22 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 209.208.96.131
X-Complaints-To: new...@atlantic.net
X-Trace: news1.atlantic.net 1014903578 209.208.96.131 (Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:39:38 EST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:39:38 EST
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:15173
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2002 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post