Re: MI5 Persecution: Grievous Bodily Harm 2/10/95 (1537)

X-posting this to poetry groups marks you.

Gee, wonder?


-- 
 AJ - http://Here.Nu
        http://Midis.Here.Nu
        http://Art.Here.Nu


<MI5...@mi5.gov.uk> wrote in message news:m07...@4ax.com...
> From: jei...@revolver.demon.co.uk (James Eibisch)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,uk.media,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc
> Subject: Re: Auntie gets it in the emails
> Reply-To: jei...@revolver.demon.co.uk
> Date: Mon Oct  2 19:44:19 1995
>
> lig...@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote:
>
>>However, I'm pleased to say that, in the past couple of days, Mike Corley has
>>stopped doing it and he appears (I say this cautiously) to be acting more
>>reasonably. True, his postings are still based on paranoid delusions.
>>However, so long as he doesn't go back to his old practices of multiple,
>>identical, unreadable postings, I'm sure that most people on this newsgroup
>>are willing to put up with him.
>
> Time to come out of the woodwork of this thread (or variations
> thereof)...
>
> I find it annoying that discussion of Mike's situation is spread over
> multiple threads - it makes it hard to follow, and especially to follow
> up. If it could be consolidated into one thread on relevant newsgroups
> (I'm reading this on uk.media btw).
>
> I'm a little surprised with the volume of abuse Mike has received, but
> believe strongly in freedom of speech if such a thing were to exist,
> which clearly includes abuse as much as anything.
>
> One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple
> prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted
> mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by
> now-influential ex-students of his university.
>
> Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security
> service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of
> the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years,
> fascinating and quite believable, even.
>
> The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the
> security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time
> to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror
> if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it
>
> We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here
> I think would be about his time at university - the people who took
> against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his
> political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy
> years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the
> very early stages.
>
> I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories generally, but I know there is
> far more that goes on in the universities, old boy's clubs, civil and
> secret services and Parliament than is ever made public.
>
> Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant
> newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new
> information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike
> Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant.
>
> Give us more detail. Who knows? It may be true, stranger things have
> happened.
>
>                   _
> James Eibisch    ('v')     N : E : T : A : D : E : L : I : C : A
> Reading, U.K.    (,_,)     http://metro.turnpike.net/J/jeibisch/
>                =======
>
> -------------------------------
> Tue, 03 Oct 1995 04:01:34           uk.misc                 Thread    3 of   14
> Lines 58              Re: Auntie gets it in the emails      Respno  16 of  16
> J.J...@ftel.co.uk      John J Smith at Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd
>
> In article <812...@revolver.demon.co.uk>,
> James Eibisch <jei...@revolver.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>lig...@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote:
>
>>One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple
>>prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted
>>mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by
>>now-influential ex-students of his university.
>
> We're trying to find this out on uk.misc. He's posted some *new* *huge*
> replies (which I'd have to give up my day job to reply to), detailing
> some things like:
>
>        a) Mike Corley is *not* his real name
>         b) Exactly what the "abuse" is (it seems be such things, as taking
>        completely unrelated newspaper articles, striving to make them a
>        disgusting insult, then redirecting against himself).
>        c) How he came to the conclusion.
>
> I think he's doing rather better nowadays..
>
>>Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security
>>service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of
>>the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years,
>>fascinating and quite believable, even.
>
> This would be a point, apart from the fact that this was directed against
> someone of political importance. I don't believe Mike is...
>
>>The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the
>>security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time
>>to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror
>>if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it
>>at some point against some people.
>
> It appears he has formed the Security Service conclusion, because they
> are the only ones capable of doing it. A "searching for an enemy capable
> of it".
>
>>We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here
>>I think would be about his time at university - the people who took
>>against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his
>>political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy
>>years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the
>>very early stages.
>
> I'm beginning to think that we never will get all the facts from Mike. We
> may, however, get enough...
>
>>Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant
>>newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new
>>information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike
>>Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant.
>
> Uk.misc, me boy...
>
>        Smid
>
> ==========================================================
>
> From: fla...@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger)
> Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.conspiracy
> Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services
> Date: Tue Oct  3 15:41:54 1995
>
> In article <44rrrh$t6...@news.ox.ac.uk>, ida...@jesus.ox.ac.uk (Illtud Daniel) says:
>
>>
>>And what do you mean when you state that the symptoms are too
>>'textbook'? Are the textbooks wrong?
>
> I think what is meant by 'textbook' is that some of the symptoms
> of 'illness' displayed in the posts seem to have been lifted from
> textbooks describing mental instability and personality disorders.
>
> I must admit I haven't seen Mike's postings before has he only just
> started posting again?
>
>
> Peter Kruger
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> http://www.gold.net/flames/
> fla...@flames.cityscape.co.uk
>
> 1537
> 

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

  []
.-==-.
|[][]|
|[][]|
|[][]|
|____|

Make your own ASCII art

Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.