Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 20 Oct 1998.
Re: New to ASCII art? Read me first!

Re: New to ASCII art? Read me first!

Angel \ Muke" Rivera > wrote in message <362...@bigfoot.com>...
>Adam Sargant probably wrote:
>[Re: Monospaced fonts]
>> Question:
>>
>> Can I do this in Outlook Express?
>
>Answer:  Yes.
>
>Tools | Options | Read | Fonts
>Change the "Proportional font" from whatever it is to Courier New (or
>whatever you like.)
>
>HTH.. HAND,
>
> --Muke!
Thanks Muke

Now I have to face up to the fact that my sig doesn't work to well. Ho hum

* * /\   *    __
    { | }   / | ~ *
  *  \/__\/ * *
     /       \   *
*  (  ^  ^  ) *
  * \   Y   /
*       *      *    *
Cosmic Bunster

Visit the Sargant Family at http://sargant.future.easyspace.com

Love is indivisible at source

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: fd588,a3cbd2209e91d84
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd588,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,a3cbd2209e91d84
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: "Adam Sargant" <ada...@bigfoot.com>
Subject: Re: New to ASCII art? Read me first!
Date: 1998/10/20
Message-ID: <70iua7$2u8$2...@apple.news.easynet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 403313229
References: <908...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <70ggnh$pk7$1...@apple.news.easynet.net> <362...@bigfoot.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
Organization: [posted via] Easynet UK
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.ascii-art.animation
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post