Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 3 Nov 1997.
Re: Time for a new FAQ? [ plus a tiny fraction of my ascii c

Re: Time for a new FAQ? [ plus a tiny fraction of my ascii collection... ;) ]

Spunk1111 <spu...@aol.com> wrote:
> Is sig length really an issue on mailing lists and other USENET
> newsgroups?  I get email from lots of people-- and many have
> sigs over the 5-6 lines...
>   I know Sven would argue the strict 4 line max for sig...
> I am curious...  I truly think that sig length concern is
> fading on the internet...


My principle is don't include the sig with every post.  If you only post
it once a month to a given group, it can be any old size; if you post it
twice a day, even two lines can get real old real fast.

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b217f9de36ff9682
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: jor...@mcs.com (Jorn Barger)
Subject: Re: Time for a new FAQ? [ plus a tiny fraction of my ascii collection...  ;) ]
Date: 1997/11/03
Message-ID: <199...@jorn.pr.mcs.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 286927272
References: <345...@spamfree.land> <345...@on.spammer> <eMcDs8858GA.283@upnetnews03> <199...@ladder02.news.aol.com>
X-Face: #0%K`N$`(&&tLbyv~^Ip59&CqKAo;?NXix@bv2a,uQX;y*zAek26=&iDOJou, 2<IZTq?NUI'[KE$^WzGnT"NAGbe_TN=N)?nG3%af}D(A^2umq3L`R57#i5y_2ZoM]wq_ 4o0(U_p!-iT!`I;Z>\2pLI"TKqjx.[BfZf#2<k\ypW"&(^^K25G!^"zlm?
Organization: Spiral Solutions
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post