Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 24 Feb 1995.
Re: Talk: Propogation, etc

Re: Talk: Propogation, etc

Dan C. Haman (dha...@nmsu.edu) wrote:

> Someone told me that more people could get to the rec groups, or 
> that the alt group was restricted somehow, I'm not sure which, but 
> if that's true I would have thought that the rec group would get 
> more responses and posts and all.  In fact, that is the reason 
> another group I'm in is changing to a rec group.  Go figure.  

The Net being a virtual anarchy it is virtually impossible to "go 
figure" anything logically.

Propagation of any newsgroup ultimately depends on the personal 
decisions of the individual Site Administrators at the hundreds of 
thousands of Net access sites on Planet Earth.  

The result is that some sites will carry both alt. groups and rec. 
groups and other sites will carry only one or the other - that's why 
you see very variable % propagation figures.  

Newsgroup readership numbers finally depend on both propagation and 
how individual Net users regard each newsgroup.  

In general the readership statistics show that mainstream newsgroups 
( The Big 7 - which includes "rec" groups ) do have higher 
propagation than Alt groups but this conclusion is only very general 
and the reality is that there is wide variation in propagation 
levels from group to group. It therefore does NOT follow that change 
from an Alt to Rec ( or any other mainstream hierarchy ) will 
automatically ensure either higher propagation or higher readership.  


====================================================================

                    Professor Peabrain advises

 
                             //////\\
                            /        \
                           _|  _   _ |_
                          |.|-(.)-(.)+.|
                           \|    J   |/
                            \   ---  /
                             \      /
                              "####"



  "Logic is the methodology by which one arrives at the incorrect 
   answer with the utmost confidence"   ----???  


  "Don't forget the most important rule to live by...never believe 
   anything you read on the InterNET."    --  Keath Cummings 2/4/93 


====================================================================

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f9437,68ef9ddb2580aee6,start
X-Google-Attributes: gidf9437,public
X-Google-Thread: f996b,a16f51a7a6fd5ddd
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-02-24 16:32:16 PST
Path: nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!zib-berlin.de!news.mathworks.com!newshost.marcam.com!uunet!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!news.starnet.net!wupost!waikato!canterbury.ac.nz!southern.co.nz!equinox.gen.nz!equinox!not-for-mail
From: Col...@equinox.gen.nz (Colin Douthwaite)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,news.groups
Subject: Re: Talk: Propogation, etc
Followup-To: rec.arts.ascii,alt.ascii-art,news.groups
Date: 24 Feb 1995 19:31:34 GMT
Organization: Southern InterNet Services
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <3ilc6m$bk...@southern.co.nz>
References: <199...@zeus.aix.calpoly.edu> <3hl3fp$61...@gagme.wwa.com> <3htjem$3h...@southern.co.nz> <3hvn6p$t0...@gagme.wwa.com> <3hvols$1f...@gagme.wwa.com> <3ic9sd$14...@southern.co.nz> <3ienl5$qj...@gagme.wwa.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: equinox.gen.nz
X-Newsreader: TIN [AMIGA 1.3 950131BETA PL0]
Xref: nntp.gmd.de alt.ascii-art:20420 news.groups:89548
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1995 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post