Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 18 Aug 2006.
Re: [PICS] Robots 108-114

Re: [PICS] Robots 108-114

_.-In alt.ascii-art, umrain wrote the following -._
> 114

You are getting close to hitting number 142,  I hit up the web page in
your signature.   I had no idea that each bot came with its own
caption.  

-- 
=()==()==()==()==()- http://fauxascii.com 
  \   \   \   \   \   \  ASCII artist
 :F_P:-O- -O- -O- -O- -O- -O-  -O- 
 \  \   \   \   \   \   \   \    \

Original message headers
X-Google-Thread: f996b,6477a3ebb7bfe66c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!peer01.cox.net!cox.net!p01!dukeread08.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
From: Faux_Pseudo <Fau...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PICS] Robots 108-114
References: <op.tegntggsdp8fk1@spacegodzilla>
Reply-To: f0s...@gmail.com
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux)
Lines: 12
Message-ID: <S_aFg.4241$W01.3877@dukeread08>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 04:04:02 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 70.160.62.157
X-Complaints-To: abu...@cox.net
X-Trace: dukeread08 1155873842 70.160.62.157 (Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:04:02 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:04:02 EDT
Organization: Cox Communications
Xref: g2news2.google.com alt.ascii-art:2292

Related ASCII art in the Gallery

Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:

About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2006 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post