Re: Request: A Faceted Diamond?
From Gilo <Gil...@gevans.demon.co.uk>
· alt.ascii-art
· 4 Jun 1997 00:00 · View full thread
· report
In article <5n22aj$ed...@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net>
SLW...@worldnet.att.net "Sandra Lee Wollin" writes:
> Hi!
>
> You all do such intricate and fantastic work that you will think this so
> simple and easy but I would love to have a faceted diamond, like you
> would see in a ring, or anything at all that conotates jewelry. Please
> do nat make it large as I would like to possibley use it as a portion of
> my signature.
I know this is no help whatsoever, but there is a diamond ascii out there
somewhere, I thought I had it, but can't seem to find it. Its pretty good too,
anyone else got it?
Its actually a ring, with the diamond sparkling at the top.
DARN!!!!
Gilo.
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: f996b,221a320d56374707 X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public From: Gil...@gevans.demon.co.uk (Gilo) Subject: Re: Request: A Faceted Diamond? Date: 1997/06/04 Message-ID: <865...@gevans.demon.co.uk>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 246017860 References: <5n22aj$ed...@mtinsc05.worldnet.att.net> X-Mail2News-User: Gil...@gevans.demon.co.uk X-Mail2News-Path: gevans.demon.co.uk Organization: hiswitzend.com Reply-To: Gil...@gevans.demon.co.uk Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1997 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.