Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 26 Jun 2001.
Re: [ANNOUNCE] Asciiizer 1.0 Released

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Asciiizer 1.0 Released

On 25 Jun 2001 23:53:26 GMT, Eli the Bearded <*@qz.little-neck.ny.us> wrote:
> In alt.ascii-art, Harry Mason <spa...@no.spam> wrote:
> > Of course, pnmtools can't do it in greyscale:
> anytopnm $file | pnmscale -yscale 0.5| pnmscale -width 75 | ppmtopgm \
> 	pgmnorm 2>/dev/null | pnminvert | pgmtoascii > $out

Ah, I don't have pgmtoascii, just pbmtoascii. I'll have to upgrade pnmtools.

-- 
Harry Mason ("hjm200.ecs@soton@ac@uk" =~ tr/@./.@/)

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,9c8d307430ee613c
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-06-26 05:51:06 PST
From: spa...@no.spam (Harry Mason)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Asciiizer 1.0 Released
References: <MPG...@news.ntlworld.com> <slr...@localhost.localdomain> <eli$010...@qz.little-neck.ny.us>
Message-ID: <slr...@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: slrn/0.9.6.3 (Linux)
NNTP-Posting-Host: exton.ecs.soton.ac.uk
Date: 26 Jun 2001 13:34:13 GMT
X-Trace: 26 Jun 2001 13:34:13 GMT, exton.ecs.soton.ac.uk
Lines: 10
Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!212.74.64.35!colt.net!newspeer.clara.net!news.clara.net!server3.netnews.ja.net!news-spool.soton.ac.uk!news.ecs.soton.ac.uk!spamblock
Xref: archiver1.google.com alt.ascii-art:6383
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 2001 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post