Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 19 May 1994.
Re: rec-arts.scarecrow ?

Re: rec-arts.scarecrow ?

Paul Fawcett:
> The reason for posting the original anonymous article was to discredit an
> individual with immunity.

Well, of course.  What's wrong with that?

I think the concern that an99451 raises is legitimate but
overinflated.  Most of the fears that people have brought up (without
moderation we'll drown in noise; moderation is censorship; etc.) seem
to me legitimate but overinflated.

Usenet is not embedded in concrete.  It changes and adapts, as much as
people are willing to.  At this point, apathy takes over.  Problems
can be dealt with as they arise.  No need to spend effort fixing
problems that may never materialize.
--

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,4d27c95738049744
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1994-05-19 14:30:12 PST
Path: gmd.de!nntp.gmd.de!xlink.net!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!psuvax1!flee
From: fle...@cse.psu.edu (Felix Lee)
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
Subject: Re: rec-arts.scarecrow ?
Date: 19 May 1994 21:02:18 GMT
Organization: Penn State Comp Sci & Eng
Lines: 16
Distribution: world
Message-ID: <FLE...@dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu>
References: <022...@anon.penet.fi> <769...@manor.demon.co.uk>
	<2rfn6d$99...@gabriel.keele.ac.uk> <769...@manor.demon.co.uk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: dictionopolis.cse.psu.edu
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1994 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post