Line: Frog (Re: Talk-line: 2 line smilies)
From W Towle <csz...@scs.leeds.ac.uk>
· rec.arts.ascii
· 8 Sep 1995 00:00 · View full thread
· report
geh...@sdrc.com (Ric Hotchkiss) writes:
|>
|> In article <365g4k$48...@gagme.wwa.com>, ogr...@netcom.com (Joe Rumsey) writes:
|> |>
|> |> ()() <-- These look good to me --> <><>
|> |> \__/ \__/
|> |>
|> |> Joe
The first looks a bit froggy to me, he said, and came up with the following
six-liner... meant to look a bit cartoony.
1 _ _
2 (o)(o)
3 ( .__, )
4 ,'\----/`.
5 < ( )__( ) >
6 ^^"^^ ^^"^^
Almost looks like he should be wearing a tie and reading the news or
something...
1 _ _
2 (o)(o) News
3 ( .__, ) at
4 ,'\-<>-/`. Ten
5 < ( )/\( ) >
6 ^^"^^\/^^"^^
--
,. William "Wills" Towle: wil...@scs.leeds.ac.uk (wil...@gps.leeds.ac.uk)
\/ If you can buy one, it's obsolete (Murphy's Laws of Computing)
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,e1087c318c6b07c7 X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public From: csz...@scs.leeds.ac.uk (W Towle) Subject: Line: Frog (Re: Talk-line: 2 line smilies) Date: 1995/09/08 Message-ID: <42qmf8$cs...@news.wwa.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 109709812 approved: bob...@wwa.com sender: bob...@miso.wwa.com references: <42o243$c5...@news.wwa.com> organization: The University of Leeds, School of Computer Studies newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
rec.arts.ascii
in 1995 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.