Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 31 Aug 1998.
5th Anniversary alt.ascii-art (1)
alt.ascii-art
· 2 messages · 31 Aug 1998 - 9 Sep 1998
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
/" "|" |_| /\ |\ | |\ | "|" \ / [" |") (" /\ |") \ /
_) | | | /""\ | \| | \| _|_ V |_ |"\ _) /""\ |"\ |
/"\ [" /\ | "|" /\ (" /' "|" "|" _ /\ |") "|"
\_/ | /""\ |_ | o /""\ _) \. _|_ _|_ /""\ |"\ |
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ( 1 ) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
| | | |___ ___ _ _ ___| |_ | |_| (_)__| |_ ___ _ _ _ _
| |_| (_-</ -_) ' \/ -_) _| | _ | (_-< _/ _ \ '_| || |
\___//__/\___|_||_\___|\__| |_| |_|_/__/\__\___/_| \_, |
|__/
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = cfbd98 = =
From: bum...@falcon.jmu.edu (Lee S. Bumgarner)
Newsgroups: news.groups
Subject: Back in the day...a return to the Great Renaming FAQ
Date: 8 Apr 1996 03:17:51 GMT
Message-ID: <4ka0gv$6t...@doc.jmu.edu>
Let me start out by explaining what I'm doing:
This is the latest revision to the Great Renaming FAQ. It's not done
(not spell check yet,even) and that's where I need your help.
Besides any spelling mistakes that might befound, give me your
advice on how to make this better. If you've read the old Great
Renaming FAQ, you can pretty much skip down to near the end where
I've added some new stuff. I need some clearification about what
*exactly* the rules are about voting.
thanks.
The Early Years
The first time anything like Usenet was ever used was during the
price and wage controls of the early 70's. It was a way for the
government to make sure all the controls were uniform. However, it
would not be until the late 70's that Usenet was actually born.
Usenet was created in late 1979as the Unix User Network when Duke
University graduate students, Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis, decided to
connect computers together in order for the Unix community to
communicate. The first two sites were "unc" and "duke," commputers
another graduate student Steve Bollovin had installed his news
software on. From this point word spread and Usenet began to grow
quickly.
Usenet in the early 80's was an obscure computer network made up of
academics and Unix users. At least one AT&T employee seems to have
though it was owned by them, because one source reported a post
saying something about a light in the AT&T parking lot. According
to Tom Geller in the Net Magazine, the first three newsgroups were
net.general, net.v7bugs and net.test. The old system could be the
possible origin of Usenet's other name, "netnews." Yet as with any
communications device, once it began to grow in popularity,
newsgroups without any technical meaning began to show up, and
eventually caused problems.
The mythological "Usenet Cabal," often referred to jokingly during
debates over new newsgroups actually existed in the form of the
"Backbone Cabal." Orginially organized by "father of the Backbone"
Gene Spafford in 1983 and formalized by him after the Great
Renaming, the Cabal was a group of site admins and their close
friends who participated in a mailing list created to encourage
stable news and mail software. The Cabal's power came from the
technology Usenet was using at the time. During these early years of
Usenet, UUCP, a point-to-point connection protocol was Usenet's only
communication method. NNTP, which would allow news traffic over
ARPAnet, (Internet's foremother) had yet to become widely used. The
two systems were connected, but not as interdependent as Internet
and Usenet are today.
Usenet had the form of a graph (in the graph-theory sense).
"Network maps" were produced from time to time. ( See Appendix )
Eventually huge Postscript files were made showing how big Usenet
had gotten. On such a diagram you can choose to emphasize a set of
lines forming a path through the hosts. Usenet's "backbone" was
simply a group of hosts whose admins agreed to form such a connected
set. They further agreed to to devote whatever resources were
necessary to carry all the Usenet traffic and to pass it on
promptly. Other, non-backbone sites might wait until night, when
their machines were less busy, to pass news along. During these
early years, a news feed depended greatly on who you knew. A lot of
people got feed because of the generosity of Bill Shannon and
Armando Stenttner who ran "decvax" at Digital (DEC). During its
hayday, the average post arriving on any given machine would likely
have been sent through a Backbone computer, because the backbone
enabled it to arrive quicker than any other link. Without the
Backbone, Usenet propagation would be incredibly delayed or just
expire before it could be transmitted. This actually happened when a
key site like the AT&T machine in Naperville, IL, known as "ihnp4",
through which almost 100% of news flowed from the West Coast.
By 1986, Usenet was experincing some growing pains. The original
scheme of just three worldwide hierarchies - net.* for unmoderated
groups, mod.* for moderated groups and fa.* for from ARPAnet was
becoming difficult to administer. The fairly haphazard way in which
new names were developed, at one point one could create a group
simply by posting to it, (several were created due to typos) only
made things worse. (This haphazard scheme still exists for local
newsgroups.)
Things came to a head when one particular net.god, future UUnet
founder and Bill Gates' pal Rick Adams, decided something must be
done. Adams, site admin for"seismo," at the Center for Seismic
Studies in northern Virginia, was powerful for a number of reasons.
Among them was seismo's status as the only link to Europe from the
US.
The Great Renaming discussion began in part because transmitting
news was quite expensive in those days and the Europeans refused to
pay for the fluff groups like net.religion and net.flame. According
to a post by Joe Buck, Adams proposed a "talk" hierarchy for the
high flame groups. As the Great Renaming discussion progressed, it
was generally understood that if a group was put in talk.* instead
of soc.* it would not be as widely propagated. According to Buck,
"The idea was that he could simply put '!talk' in the configuration
file for each connected site that didn't want these groups,"
According to the soc.culture.jewish FAQ, the group's name is an
example of this. Orginally "net.religion.jewish," it was generally
believed during the GreatRenaming discussion that renaming it
"talk.religion.jewish" would be detrimental to the group's success.
This problem was solved by proposing the group be placed in the
soc.culture.* hierarchy.
Due to Usenet's structural conservatism, Adams had to threaten to
pull out ofUsenet altogether before people took notice. Thus,
through default, the task of the Great Renaming was given to the
Backbone Cabal. The Great Renaming started July 1986 and ended in
March 1987, according to Henry Edward Hardy's history. Among the
people involved with the initial discussion on the mailing list were
Chuq von Rospach and Spaf. There was some concern that the Backbone
Cabal, which was made up of a small group male computer experts in
their 20's and30's, would be deciding the newsgroups for the entire,
diverse Usenet community. The Cabal and their cronies often
reiterated a magic phrase: "Usenet works by the golden rule: whoever
has the gold, makes the rules." This was their way of saying they
weren't going to pay the long-distance transmission charges for
groups they didn't like.
Much of the debate centered on ways in which the wider Usenet
community could somewhat support the backbone financially, so
everyone could keep getting the groups they wanted. In the end, no
one thought anything like that would work. Various people also
proposed schemes for cutting down volume. As the Great Renaming
discussion progressed, a current list of proposed new newsgroups was
posted to net.news several times along the way. However, protests by
a few vocal people forced changes (This is Usenet after all). So
under the direction of the Cabal the Great Renaming happen. One of
the big debates of the Great Renaming had been whether there should
be a "drugs" newsgroup *anywhere,* This putative newsgroups was the
example people used of a group that sysadmins would never be able to
convince their bosses to support. Usenet at the time was a very low
key affair and Sysadmins feared drawing any undue attention to
Usenet ingeneral. They feared if their bosses became aware of a drug
newsgroup they would pull the plug on their Usenet feed altogether.
In any event, under the direction of the direction of the Cabal, the
Great Renaming happened and the current comp,misc,news,rec,sci,
soc,talk, was created.
Yet ironically, nothing really changed for a significant portion of
sites, and almostall the sites except company ones still got a full
feed. As has been so often the case in Usenet history, its
"imminent death" was postponed by advances intechonology. The
connectivity, modem baud rates, storage capacity, etc improved so
dramatically that very few university and public-access sties
dropped the soc.* talk.* and later alt.* groups.
For a few years after the Great Renaming, however, these groups were
not transmitted to Europe, although that changed after NNTP. So the
major effect of the Great Renaming was just to organize the groups
better. Since the community in question was Usenet, there was bound
to be some disagreement over the proposed general renaming of
groups.
After the 1986 Usenix conference, Spaf formalized the Backbone
Cabal. He began to regulerly post a PostScript map and a description
of what was a Backbone site. Spaf, quoted by Hardy, said a being a
Backbone site ment "good connectivity, carrying the mainstream
groups, and a commitment to stable news and mail software."
At some point, Net.Legend Brian Reid, a member of the Cabal, decided
he didn't like how things were going. So he, John Gilmore and Gordon
Moffett discussed the creation of an "Alternet" over dinner on May
7, 1987 at G.T's Sunset BBQ in Mount View California. An
"alternative" distribution system was organized by this group that
didn't use the "backbone" links. A new top-level hierarchy name
"alt.*" was created for this distribution. In Henry Edward Hardy's
history, Reid is quoted as saying:
" John's home computer was "hoptoad"; my home computer was
"mejac". We set up a link between us, and each of us set up a
link to amdahl, and we vowed to pass all alt traffic to each
other and to nurse the net along. In those days one sent out
numerous newgroup messages in the hopes that one would "take";
by the end of May the groups alt.test, alt.config, alt.drugs,
and alt.gourmand were active. At the time I also managed
"decwrl", so I quietly added "alt" to the list of groups that
it carried. "
Reid created the first alt.* group, alt.gourmand , because the Cabal
wanted to put his recipe group under rec.food.* Reid, who was
moderating mod.recipies, objected to the name rec.food.recipes
because there were non-food recipes.Gilmore objected the Cabal's
dropping of net.flame and the refusal to create rec.drugs. (Moffett
just wanted to help.) Alt.drugs was also created around this time.
Yet it was not until the rec/soc.sex debate nearly a year later that
alt.* really began to take off. It all started because Richard
Sexton is a bad speller. Sexton wanted to show his friend Ralph
Freidenberg how to post to Usenet, so as a joke he posted the
message "I propose the newsfroup rec.fucking." to talk.bizarre. At
the time, he thought he had set the distribution to "local" thus
keeping it on the gryphon.com machine. Yet because of a spelling
error in the "Distribution:" line the post went out into the greater
Usenet. There was a lot of sex-related traffic being carried in
soc.singles at the time, and the talk.bizarre readers of the time
would not let an idea like that go, so the idea took on a life of
its own.
According to Peter daSilva, this was all happening during a time
when the Backbone Cabal was beginning to experiment with interest
polls. "Rec.fucking was one of a series of proposals created to
attack the Cabal (along with comp.protocols.tcp-ip.eniac and
sci.aquaria, somewhat later)...." da Silva stated in a post.
(As a side note, c.p.tcp-ip.eniac is essentially a joke group. The
eniac was one of the first computers ever created and thus could not
support TCP/IP.)
After the groups name went from rec.sex to soc.sex in a futile attempt to
pass it, Reid proceeded to create alt.sex and alt.rock-n-roll the
afternoon of April 3, 1988. Reid sent the following to the Backbone
Cabal when he did it:
That meant that the alt network now carried alt.sex and alt.drugs.
It was therefore artistically necessary to create alt.rock-n-
roll,which I have also done. I have no idea what sort of traffic it
will carry. If the bizzarroids take it over I will rmgroup it or
moderate it;otherwise I will let it be.
-taken from Henry Edward Hardy's Internet History.
Breaking of the Backbone Cabal
A number of simultaneous events rendered the Backbone Cabal
irrelevant. The most important was the increase use of NNTP around
this same time. Usenet's use of Internet made it easer to ignore
what the Backbone news admins thought. Acording to Reid, the
Backbone started to decline when he and Richard Sexton snuck the
site "gryphon" into the Backbone news admins thought. Acording to
Reid, the Backbone started to decline when he and Richard Sexton
snuck the site "gryphon" into the backbone. It was arranged to get
"gryphon," a 386 PC in Greg Laskin's living room in Los Angeles, to
get news feed from "famous and important" backbone sites and thus
put into the official backbone map.
Also, the new procedures set up after the Great Renaming led to a
challenge by "readers" against the "privileged" positions of the
admins. Early in Usenet's life, one could create a group simply by
posting to it, and a number of groups were created because of typos.
Later a new group would be created after a subject had sufficient
traffic on an existing group. Then the Cabal would figure out the
name and create it. The Cabal was strongest right before the Great
Renaming: backbone sites refused to carry groups they considered
stupid.
The new procedure went something like this, according to Greg
Woodbury. Someone proposed a newsgroup and then the Cabal talked
about the potentials of/for the new group. The Cabal defined a name
for the group, and asked for theviews of other admins a bout the
group and then finally if the group name was good enough they would
create the group. The original system eventually became the proposal
and "vote" scheme of the Big *. Holding votes was a way to make
people shut up if a group was unpopular. Even though there is no one
"in control"of Usenet, the voting system is the colsest thing to a
government it has. The current voted format was laid down around
right before the Great Renaming, but not used until 1987. Once the
voting mechanism was in place, the individual opinions of the
backbone-site admins no longer mattered much..
Lastly, Usenet's changing make up was involved. Adams was given a
loan by USENIX to set up a non-profit Usenet site. Eventually this
became UUnet and thus as a commercial entity existing to distribute
news, had every reason _to_ carry all of alt.* .
During the Cabal's last days, its death was quicken by "comp.women"
debacle, as it was later known. In summer, 1988, a newsgroup for
woman was proposed. Its creation became the subject of a massive
flame war because its supporters wantedto put it in the comp.*
groups for better propagation. Opponents noted this hierarchy was
devoted to far more technical things. After *much* discussion
someone created a " comp.society.women" out of exasperation. This
person got a great deal of flamage for doing so, but the group came
to life after it was created.
About a month or so after the comp.society.women debate, the
backbone mailinglist having gone almost entirely silent, Spaf
announced he was going to shut it down. It had become silent because
very few people were using dialup UUCPnet links anymore. A few
months after _that_, it was observed that the list had become
/dev/null. According to Jim Jewett, the Cabal's "last act was to
sanction Ed Vielmetti's rush creation of comp.sys.next." Regardless,
the Backbone Cabal was dead, and the "Usenet Cabal" myth was born.
Richard Sexton and Usenet consitutional crisis.
Yet in a way things did not change all that much. After the death of
the Backbone Cabal, Spaf was installed as the new group creation
"Tsar." Spaf's place in Usenet culture can not be over stressed,
even though his famus "Burn out letter." was posted in the early
90's.
One of the biggest events during Spaf's post-Backbone Cabal days was
the 1989 aquarium reorganization controvery, which is the closest to
a constiutional crisis Usenet will ever get. Richard Sexton noticed
at some point that there was no newsgroup for tropical fish
officanos. He posted to rec.pets, but only got 2 responses in 6
months. He thus proposed a group for aquaria. When the vote failed
by a 10% margin, Bob Webber created alt.aquaria. Soon, the group was
getting about 40 posts a day but because it was in alt.* it did not
have great distibution and was not read in Europe. Readers of the
group generally believed that it should subject sould be mainstreemed
via a rec.group.
Yet Sexton decided disagreed. A vote for sci.military had recently
been succesful and Sexton reasoned "if killing people was a science
then so was keeping tropical fish; besides, sci.aquaria would make
it to Europe," Sexton says in the Net.Legends FAQ.
Following the newsgroup creation guidelines of the time, a
discussion was held for two weeks on the group, and popular opinion
was very much against it. Yet the discussion phase was non-binding
so Sexton went ahead and called the vote anyway. At this point, the
Backbone Cabal came back for one last fight. Sexton got a lot of his
ex-Cabal friends to skillfully forge yes votes and the group passed
938 to 727. The forgeries went undetected and Spaf created the
group, although many sites did either refused to honor the newsgroup
or forwarded its traffic into one of the other *.aquaria groups. It
was a this point that newsgroup creation rules were changed and
among the changes was the additon of 2/3's majority rule for a
successful vote.
Thanks
Many thanks to the following, for without them this thing would not
exist:
James "Kibo" Parry , kib...@world.std.com, David
Lawrence(tal...@uunet.uu.net), ebr...@cs.hmc.edu
be...@std.sbi.com,jg...@alpha1.csd.uwm.edu (John G
Dobnick),ben...@maths.lth.se "Bengt Larsson, jp...@hammer.msfc.nasa.gov
(J. Porter Clark),Gregory G. "Wolfe" Woodbury, (gg...@cds.duke.edu),
ms...@sq.sq.com (Mark Brader) Ed....@Eng.Sun.COM (Ed Falk),jgd@alpha1.
csd.uwm.edu (John G Dobnick), tg...@netcom.com (Tom Lane),
Kar...@cs.cmu.edu sho...@dinah.tc.cornell.edu (Melinda
Shore),gle...@access.digex.net (D. Glenn Arthur Jr.),
atk...@sundance.itd.nrl.navy.mil (Ran Atkinson), twi...@netcom.com
(Tom Wilson), jma...@admin5.hsc. uth.tmc.edu (Jay
Maynard), jam...@cs.sfu.ca (jamie andrews), Henry Edward Hardy
ser...@umcc.umich
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Appendix:
--------------------------------------------------------------------
UUCP/USENET Logical Map - June 1, 1981 / mods by S. McGeady 11/19/81
(ucbvax)
+=+================================+==+
| | | |
| | wivax | |
| | | | |
| | microsoft| uiucdcs | |
| | genradbo | | | | | | (Tektronix)
| | | | | | | purdue | |
|decvax+=+=+====+=+=+ | | | |
| | | | | | | pur-phy | | tekmdp
| | | | | | | | | | |
+@@@@@cca| | | | | | | | |
| | | | +=pur-ee=+=+=====+===+ | |
| csin | | | | | |
| | +==o===+===================+==+========+=======+====teklabs=+
| | | |
| | | pdp phs grumpy wolfvax |
| | | | | | | |
| | cincy unc=+===+======+========+ |
| | | bio | |
| | | (Misc) | | (Misc) |
| | | sii reed | dukgeri duke34 utzoo |
| | | | | | | | | |
| +====+=+=+==+====++======+==++===duke=+===+=======+==+=========+ |
| | | | | | | | | | u11
0
| bmd70 ucf-cs ucf | andiron | | | | |
| | | | | | |
| red | | | | | pyu
x
| | | | zeppo | | | |
| psupdp---psuvax | | | | | | |
| | | | alice | whuxlb | utah-cs | | hou
x
| allegra | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | +--chico---+
| +===+=mhtsa====research | /=+=======harpo=+==+ | |
| | | | | | / | | |
| hocsr | | +=+=============+=/ cbosg---+ | |
| ucbopt | | | | | esquire |
| : | | | cbosgd | |
| : | | | | |
| ucbcory | | eagle==+=====+=====+======+=====+ | |
| : | | | | | | | | | +-uwvax--+
| : | | | mhuxa mhuxh mhuxj mhuxm mhuxv | |
| : | | | | |
| : | | | +----------------------------o--+
| : | | | | |
| ucbcad | | | ihpss mh135a |
| : | | | | | |
| : \--o--o------ihnss----vax135----cornell |
| : | | | | |
+=+==ucbvax=======+===+==+=+======+=======+=+========+=========+
(UCB) : | | | | (Silicon valley)
ucbarpa cmevax | | menlo70--hao
: | | | |
ucbonyx | | | sri-unix
| ucsfcg1 |
| | |
Legend: | | sytek====+========+
------- | | | |
- | / \ + + Uucp sdcsvax=+=======+=+======+ intelga zehntel
= "Bus" | | |
o jumps sdcarl phonlab sdcattb
: Berknet
@ Arpanet
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Bye,
.----- On 31 Aug 1998 18:28:44 GMT, Colin Douthwaite posted:
|
|= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
|
|
| /" "|" |_| /\ |\ | |\ | "|" \ / [" |") (" /\ |") \ /
| _) | | | /""\ | \| | \| _|_ V |_ |"\ _) /""\ |"\ |
|
|
| /"\ [" /\ | "|" /\ (" /' "|" "|" _ /\ |") "|"
| \_/ | /""\ |_ | o /""\ _) \. _|_ _|_ /""\ |"\ |
|
|
|
|= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = ( 1 ) = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
|
| _ _ _ _ _ _ _
| | | | |___ ___ _ _ ___| |_ | |_| (_)__| |_ ___ _ _ _ _
| | |_| (_-</ -_) ' \/ -_) _| | _ | (_-< _/ _ \ '_| || |
| \___//__/\___|_||_\___|\__| |_| |_|_/__/\__\___/_| \_, |
| |__/
|
|= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = cfbd98 = =
|
|
|
|
|The Early Years
|
|The first time anything like Usenet was ever used was during the
|price and wage controls of the early 70's. It was a way for the
|government to make sure all the controls were uniform. However, it
|would not be until the late 70's that Usenet was actually born.
|Usenet was created in late 1979as the Unix User Network when Duke
|University graduate students, Tom Truscott and Jim Ellis, decided to
|connect computers together in order for the Unix community to
|communicate. The first two sites were "unc" and "duke," commputers
|another graduate student Steve Bollovin had installed his news
|software on. From this point word spread and Usenet began to grow
|quickly.
|
\
> SNIP!
/
|
|At some point, Net.Legend Brian Reid, a member of the Cabal, decided
|he didn't like how things were going. So he, John Gilmore and Gordon
|Moffett discussed the creation of an "Alternet" over dinner on May
|7, 1987 at G.T's Sunset BBQ in Mount View California. An
|"alternative" distribution system was organized by this group that
|didn't use the "backbone" links. A new top-level hierarchy name
|"alt.*" was created for this distribution. In Henry Edward Hardy's
|history, Reid is quoted as saying:
|
| " John's home computer was "hoptoad"; my home computer was
| "mejac". We set up a link between us, and each of us set up a
| link to amdahl, and we vowed to pass all alt traffic to each
| other and to nurse the net along. In those days one sent out
| numerous newgroup messages in the hopes that one would "take";
| by the end of May the groups alt.test, alt.config, alt.drugs,
| and alt.gourmand were active. At the time I also managed
| "decwrl", so I quietly added "alt" to the list of groups that
| it carried. "
|
|Reid created the first alt.* group, alt.gourmand , because the Cabal
|wanted to put his recipe group under rec.food.* Reid, who was
|moderating mod.recipies, objected to the name rec.food.recipes
|because there were non-food recipes.Gilmore objected the Cabal's
|dropping of net.flame and the refusal to create rec.drugs. (Moffett
|just wanted to help.) Alt.drugs was also created around this time.
\
> SNIP!
/
|
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
| Appendix:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|
|UUCP/USENET Logical Map - June 1, 1981 / mods by S. McGeady 11/19/81
|
| (ucbvax)
|+=+================================+==+
|| | | |
|| | wivax | |
|| | | | |
|| | microsoft| uiucdcs | |
|| | genradbo | | | | | | (Tektronix)
|| | | | | | | purdue | |
||decvax+=+=+====+=+=+ | | | |
|| | | | | | | pur-phy | | tekmdp
|| | | | | | | | | | |
|+@@@@@cca| | | | | | | | |
|| | | | +=pur-ee=+=+=====+===+ | |
|| csin | | | | | |
|| | +==o===+===================+==+========+=======+====teklabs=+
|| | | |
|| | | pdp phs grumpy wolfvax |
|| | | | | | | |
|| | cincy unc=+===+======+========+ |
|| | | bio | |
|| | | (Misc) | | (Misc) |
|| | | sii reed | dukgeri duke34 utzoo |
|| | | | | | | | | |
|| +====+=+=+==+====++======+==++===duke=+===+=======+==+=========+ |
|| | | | | | | | | | u11
|0
|| bmd70 ucf-cs ucf | andiron | | | | |
|| | | | | | |
|| red | | | | | pyu
|x
|| | | | zeppo | | | |
|| psupdp---psuvax | | | | | | |
|| | | | alice | whuxlb | utah-cs | | hou
|x
|| allegra | | | | | | | | | |
|| | | | | | | | | +--chico---+
|| +===+=mhtsa====research | /=+=======harpo=+==+ | |
|| | | | | | / | | |
|| hocsr | | +=+=============+=/ cbosg---+ | |
|| ucbopt | | | | | esquire |
|| : | | | cbosgd | |
|| : | | | | |
|| ucbcory | | eagle==+=====+=====+======+=====+ | |
|| : | | | | | | | | | +-uwvax--+
|| : | | | mhuxa mhuxh mhuxj mhuxm mhuxv | |
|| : | | | | |
|| : | | | +----------------------------o--+
|| : | | | | |
|| ucbcad | | | ihpss mh135a |
|| : | | | | | |
|| : \--o--o------ihnss----vax135----cornell |
|| : | | | | |
|+=+==ucbvax=======+===+==+=+======+=======+=+========+=========+
| (UCB) : | | | | (Silicon valley)
| ucbarpa cmevax | | menlo70--hao
| : | | | |
| ucbonyx | | | sri-unix
| | ucsfcg1 |
| | | |
|Legend: | | sytek====+========+
|------- | | | |
|- | / \ + + Uucp sdcsvax=+=======+=+======+ intelga zehntel
|= "Bus" | | |
|o jumps sdcarl phonlab sdcattb
|: Berknet
|@ Arpanet
|
|
|= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
|
'------------------------
Er, um, what does this have to do with aaa, besides it being a usenet
newsgroup? :o/
|\/| _..__|_o._ /\_|_| o._ _ mart.atkins@--
| |(_|| |_|| | /--\|_|<|| |_> --bigfoot.com
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
,sSSs ,SSSS_/ ,_ sS/`))\// sS//|_(_/ _, SS\\\ `""-.-'` / sSS` jgs-==-'`'-._\
___________ | _______ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |_______| | |___________|
//O\\
|\/\/\/| | | | | | (o)(o) C _) | ,___| | / /____\
|HHHHH/"\"\HHHHHHH| |HH`\|_.-)'|/'dP,H| |Hb.`\\_/_//'.oddH| |HHHb|`.\/\,'|HHHH| |HHHHHb/\/\/|HHHHH| |"""""""""""""""""| | |"" /\ \ / |"" | | |__/--\ \/ __| |
_________
/___ ___\
//@@@\ /@@@\\
\\@@@/ \@@@//
\___ " ___/
| - |
\_/ jrjc Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this thread.
These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 1998 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.