Original Usenet thread from alt.ascii-art, started 18 Feb 2002.
profiles
alt.ascii-art
· 79 messages · 18 Feb 2002 - 27 Feb 2002
Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u
On 18 Feb 2002 23:59:40 GMT, smi...@aol.com (Smishy20) wrote in message
<200...@mb-fv.aol.com>:
>Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u
no... now piss off...
--
I am your father
In article <200...@mb-fv.aol.com>, Smishy20 wrote:
> Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u
well, ive never used aol, so im not absolutely certain what you need
do you mean something thats a web page? or just the profile that aim
users can see?
if its the latter, just make sure it is fixed width (courier new, lucida
console or some other similar font) and draw what you want
since i think that aim profile windows tend to be small, you will want
to keep your artwork small too; otherwise it will wrap
if its for a web page type profile, i dont know what advice to give
since i dont know what kind of access you have to editing web pages (ie
can you edit source, or is it wysiwyg)
if you have more specific questions, that would be helpful
obascii:
__
/_ \
` ) )
/ /
|_|
(_)
question mark... or captain hook's hook
--
| A___A _/_ /_ _ / _ _/_ _ ,_ _
| ( @ @ ) (/(/ (/(/ (/(/.( / /(-'/< (_\( . (_) / `(_)
| \_^_/ katATthekatDOTorg ._/
On 19 Feb 2002 00:49:43 GMT, the kat <nospam@127.0.0.1> wrote in message <slr...@ryoko.CNS.cwru.edu>: >In article <200...@mb-fv.aol.com>, Smishy20 wrote: >> Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u >well, ive never used aol, you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! -- I am your father
"the kat" <nospam@127.0.0.1> wrote ... > Smishy20 wrote: > > Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u > > well, i<snip> > obascii: > __ > /_ \ > ` ) ) > / / > |_| > (_) > > question mark... or captain hook's hook <diddle> __ /, \ ` )') ^ / /______ (_________) (_.)_______) <diddle> or a snake -Phydeaux
>Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u >>well, ive never used aol, > >you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? > >fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! at least they tried to help
On 19 Feb 2002 01:14:47 GMT, smi...@aol.com (Smishy20) wrote in message <200...@mb-de.aol.com>: >>Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u >>>well, ive never used aol, >>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? >>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >at least they tried to help because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try to help you but actually know less about it than you do... -- I am your father
Lord Vader | >at least they tried to help | | because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try to help you but | actually know less about it than you do... | Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC), "Laury" <gni...@moc.tenretnitb> wrote: >Lord Vader >| >at least they tried to help >| >| because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try >to help you but >| actually know less about it than you do... >| >Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept. It's troll math, sort of like the accounting style of Enron Corp.
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC), "Laury" <gni...@moc.tenretnitb> wrote in message <a4uamq$lab$1...@helle.btinternet.com>: >Lord Vader >| >at least they tried to help >| because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try >to help you but >| actually know less about it than you do... >Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept. show us yer tits, laury... -- I am your father
On 19 Feb 2002 20:14:41 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote in message <3c72b153.17728025@205.158.27.245>: >On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC), "Laury" <gni...@moc.tenretnitb> wrote: >>Lord Vader >>| >at least they tried to help >>| because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try >>to help you but >>| actually know less about it than you do... >>Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept. >It's troll math, sort of like the accounting style of Enron Corp. or... thinking harder... the person asking the question has AOL... the person "answering" does not even have AOL... ergo, it stands to reason they know less... HTH, HASD -- I am your father
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:15:32 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in message <k6c...@4ax.com>: >>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? >>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >Are you a jerk or just pretending? show me yer tits and i'll tell you... -- I am your father
Are you a jerk or just pretending? >you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? >fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...!
In: alt.ascii-art On: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800 From: Nat <non...@century.net> (fixed top-post for clarity) >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? >Nat > Yes. But there are a few loud adolescents who ruin the fun for the rest of us :/ -- Olli "Dronir" Wilkman Yellow: Scream softly (Stan Kegel)
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in message <8jh...@4ax.com>: >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you wanted to talk to me...? in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... -- I am your father
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:14:23 GMT, oll...@pp.inet.fi (Olli Wilkman) wrote in message <3c7...@news.inet.fi>: > In: alt.ascii-art > On: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800 > From: Nat <non...@century.net> >(fixed top-post for clarity) >>>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? >>>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >>>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? >>>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... >>U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? >>Nat >Yes. Liar... >But there are a few loud adolescents who ruin the fun for the rest >of us :/ do I ruin your "fun"...? hope so... -- I am your father
U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? Nat >>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? >>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >>Are you a jerk or just pretending? > >show me yer tits and i'll tell you...
On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:36:54 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in message <bpq...@4ax.com>: >On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:15:48 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> >wrote: >>do I ruin your "fun"...? hope so... >Typical insecure juvenile response. i can see you take this _very_ seriously... how sad... -- I am your father
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:15:48 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>
wrote:
>do I ruin your "fun"...? hope so...
Typical insecure juvenile response.
Olli Wilkman <oll...@pp.inet.fi> wrote: > Nat <non...@century.net> wrote: >>> [Lots of crap from killfiled people] > >>U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > > Yes. But there are a few loud adolescents who ruin the fun for the rest > of us :/ ,--------------------------. / Then put them in your \ : killfile and stop replying : /\/\/\/\/\/\/\ | to their posts. | : : : Disregard is the best way ; | | \ to make them go away. / | | `. ,-----------------------' | | |/ | __`, | / \ | \__*/__ : ___) \ \ : _______/ | / ; : ; ; `""*--*"" SSt Sebastian :) -- ,~~ ~~~__~~~___________________________ ______ ______ _\/_/\/\|[]| | news:de.alt.rec.ascii-art | |[][][]| |[][][]| /]__ __ |-| www.ascii-art.surfhome.de |-|_ || _|-|_ || _| _"`'O'--'OO'-'__`O''O'____`O'-'O'____`O''O'__'O'--'O'_'O'--'O'_
and there are people who talk about FRAMES and WebSites while they still use LYNX!!! and not even a Proper Browser..... TADA!!!!! WOW!! What a concept!!! ?:) "Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:kkg...@4ax.com... > On 19 Feb 2002 20:14:41 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote > in message <3c72b153.17728025@205.158.27.245>: > >On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC), "Laury" <gni...@moc.tenretnitb> wrote: > >>Lord Vader > >>| >at least they tried to help > >>| because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try > >>to help you but > >>| actually know less about it than you do... > >>Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept. > >It's troll math, sort of like the accounting style of Enron Corp. > > or... thinking harder... the person asking the question has AOL... the > person "answering" does not even have AOL... ergo, it stands to reason they > know less... > > HTH, HASD > > -- > I am your father
On 2002-02-21 Pos...@NoSpam.net said:
>and there are people who talk about FRAMES and WebSites while they
>still use LYNX!!! and not even a Proper Browser..... TADA!!!!!
>WOW!! What a concept!!!
--
Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist
.,,,.
#### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.'
## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a
###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can
## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites.
## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know.
On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:18:30 +0400, "Poster" <Pos...@NoSpam.net> wrote in message <a52703$b2c...@OM9.omantel.net.om>: >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message >news:kkg...@4ax.com... >> On 19 Feb 2002 20:14:41 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) >> >On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC), "Laury" ><gni...@moc.tenretnitb> wrote: >> >>Lord Vader >> >>| >at least they tried to help >> >>| because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try >> >>to help you but >> >>| actually know less about it than you do... >> >>Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept. >> >It's troll math, sort of like the accounting style of Enron Corp. >> or... thinking harder... the person asking the question has AOL... the >> person "answering" does not even have AOL... ergo, it stands to reason >they >> know less... >and there are people who talk about FRAMES and WebSites while they still use >LYNX!!! and not even a Proper Browser..... TADA!!!!! WOW!! What a concept!!! yep... they're morons too... like you... -- I am your father
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 05:44:57 -0000, ann...@oal.com wrote in message <u7b...@corp.supernews.com>: > >On 2002-02-21 Pos...@NoSpam.net said: > >and there are people who talk about FRAMES and WebSites while they > >still use LYNX!!! and not even a Proper Browser..... TADA!!!!! > >WOW!! What a concept!!! >Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist > .,,,. > #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! you've already proven to the satisfaction of everyone here that your tech knowledge is close to zero... now fuck off, you old senile fuck... -- I am your father
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:2ac...@4ax.com... > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in message > <8jh...@4ax.com>: > >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? > >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? > >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... > >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > > why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you wanted to > talk to me...? > > in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... Should we have the honour of seeing yours first? -- .|. (*.*) /* My sig delimiter is broken */ -
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:54:02 +0100, "Sebastian Pe�a Saldarriaga" <seb...@free.fr> wrote in message <a55ct5$4ovg5$1...@ID-126266.news.dfncis.de>: >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message >news:2ac...@4ax.com... >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in >message >> <8jh...@4ax.com>: >> >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat >gobhole...? >> >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >> >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? >> >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... >> >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? >> why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you wanted >to >> talk to me...? >> in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... > Should we have the honour of seeing yours first? you like seeing male breasts...? faggot...! -- I am your father
On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Phydeaux wrote: > > Smishy20 wrote: > > obascii: > > __ > > /_ \ > > ` ) ) > > / / > > |_| > > (_) > > > > question mark... or captain hook's hook > <diddle> > __ > /, \ > ` )') > ^ / /______ > (_________) > (_.)_______) > > <diddle> > or a snake > __ /, \ ` )') ^ / / (_~, (_.) (_ , (_') /TT Diddled into a snake curled about a pole. oo'`II II II II ,"^^". -- ` `-- -Tali
Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:51:33 +0200 brugte Lord Vader 24 linier p� at fort�lle dette til alt.ascii-art: >> >and there are people who talk about FRAMES and WebSites while they >> >still use LYNX!!! and not even a Proper Browser..... TADA!!!!! >> >WOW!! What a concept!!! >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist >> .,,,. >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. >BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! >you've already proven to the satisfaction of everyone here that your tech >knowledge is close to zero... Maybe so, but in this case, I'm inclined to agree with her... :-) >now fuck off, you old senile fuck... Old and senile at 14? God, I must be a mummy, then... :-( -- Lars Rander, www.rander.dk ICQ#: 987520 ** Pil ikke ved min adresse ** Sjathelt og beskytter af det svage k�n (udn�vnt af diktator SEJ 5/6-99) Den store forskel mellem sex for penge og gratis sex er, at sex for penge almindeligvis koster meget mindre. (Brendan Francis)
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:12:22 +0100, Rander <ldN...@rander.dk> wrote in message <8m1...@rander.dk>: >Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:51:33 +0200 brugte Lord Vader 24 linier p� at fort�lle >dette til alt.ascii-art: >>> >and there are people who talk about FRAMES and WebSites while they >>> >still use LYNX!!! and not even a Proper Browser..... TADA!!!!! >>> >WOW!! What a concept!!! >>>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist >>> .,,,. >>> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >>>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >>>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >>>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >>>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. >>BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! >>you've already proven to the satisfaction of everyone here that your tech >>knowledge is close to zero... >Maybe so, but in this case, I'm inclined to agree with her... :-) well that is just bullshit... since Lynx is text only, it is not a proper browser and will not be a proper browser until it displays a page as it was designed... i think this concept is very simple for most people to understand... >>now fuck off, you old senile fuck... >Old and senile at 14? God, I must be a mummy, then... :-( it has already been establised that 'she' is lying... 'she' is a 50 something year old pedophile posing as a 14yo girl in the hopes of capturing the interest of young boys online, for obvious reasons... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:49:15 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <upf...@4ax.com>: >On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:39:41 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:12:22 +0100, Rander <ldN...@rander.dk> wrote in >>message <8m1...@rander.dk>: >>>>you've already proven to the satisfaction of everyone here that your tech >>>>knowledge is close to zero... >>>Maybe so, but in this case, I'm inclined to agree with her... :-) >>well that is just bullshit... since Lynx is text only, it is not a proper >>browser and will not be a proper browser until it displays a page as it was >>designed... >Nearly no browsers display a page as it was designed. HTML is widely open >to interpretation. If you want it to look as displayed, use pdfs. a graphics browser like IE, Netscape or Opera is a proper browser... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 01:07:53 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <nbq...@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 02:31:09 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 22:49:15 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> >>wrote in message <upf...@4ax.com>: >>>On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 20:39:41 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, >>> (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>>>On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 19:12:22 +0100, Rander <ldN...@rander.dk> wrote in >>>>message <8m1...@rander.dk>: >>>>>>you've already proven to the satisfaction of everyone here that your tech >>>>>>knowledge is close to zero... >>>>>Maybe so, but in this case, I'm inclined to agree with her... :-) >>>>well that is just bullshit... since Lynx is text only, it is not a proper >>>>browser and will not be a proper browser until it displays a page as it was >>>>designed... >>>Nearly no browsers display a page as it was designed. HTML is widely open >>>to interpretation. If you want it to look as displayed, use pdfs. >>a graphics browser like IE, Netscape or Opera is a proper browser... >And they all render differently. yeh... there are some differences... but by and large the average page displays very similarly in all 3... except of course for Lynx... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
Lord Vader (vad...@empire.starwars.com) wrote:
: On 19 Feb 2002 20:14:41 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote
: in message <3c72b153.17728025@205.158.27.245>:
: >>Lord Vader
<snip>
: or... thinking harder... the person asking the question has AOL... the
: person "answering" does not even have AOL... ergo, it stands to reason they
: know less...
<snip>
--> As if any AOLer knows dick. Not `even' having AOL, is a PLUS.
But then, you probably _DO_ have AOL. You have my sympathies.
--
E.A.G.L.E Librarian A3 BBS:403/481-3133 email:ttu...@ecn.ab.ca
"Taliszanna" wrote...
<diddle>
____________________________________________
.|=====| - WHAT THE ?!?!!
:\ /.
/ /\ \:
( II) )
\ `-._/: .
. /\.//#: :
: /\II\#/\
:/`#II \##\
/##/II \#/
\#/ II
II
II
II
II
II ***BBBBBBRRRRRRIII-
II IIINNNNNGGGGGG!!!***
][
/, \
`I)')
^ / /
(_~,
(_.)
(_ ,
(_')
/TT
oo'`II
II
II
II
,"^^".
-- ` `--------------------------------------
</diddle>
-Phydeaux
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 05:01:26 GMT, ttu...@ecn.ab.ca () wrote in message <GmFd8.1154$NZ5.95329@localhost>: >Lord Vader (vad...@empire.starwars.com) wrote: >: On 19 Feb 2002 20:14:41 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote >: in message <3c72b153.17728025@205.158.27.245>: >: >>Lord Vader ><snip> >: or... thinking harder... the person asking the question has AOL... the >: person "answering" does not even have AOL... ergo, it stands to reason they >: know less... ><snip> >--> As if any AOLer knows dick. Not `even' having AOL, is a PLUS. > But then, you probably _DO_ have AOL. You have my sympathies. I think I see your problem: NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.161.206.2 IP resolves to: freenet.edmonton.ab.ca clearly a dumb Canuck is too clueless to realise that we don't use AOL in South Africa... Hell, you prolly think I'm a yank... *** the AOLer is a clueless cretin too, but you just demonstrated that not having AOL does not qualify you for much either... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:03:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <t53...@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 04:43:32 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 01:07:53 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> >>wrote in message <nbq...@4ax.com>: >>>>>Nearly no browsers display a page as it was designed. HTML is widely open >>>>>to interpretation. If you want it to look as displayed, use pdfs. >>>>a graphics browser like IE, Netscape or Opera is a proper browser... >>>And they all render differently. >>yeh... there are some differences... but by and large the average page >>displays very similarly in all 3... except of course for Lynx... >Or Opera with the images turned off, or Netscape with javascript turned >off, or IE with java turned off, or IE when it's putting pink stripes >across images, i'm not interested in people who screw their browser settings up... the browser is fine, the people are fucked... >or an old browser that doesn't understand certain tags, not a proper browser then... only the latest version of a browser is a "proper" one... >or someone viewing in 4-bit colour etc etc etc... i don't give a fuck what the idiots have done to fuck their PCs up... I'm assuming optimal configuration of PC, OS, browser and whatever the fuck else you can think of next... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:02:32 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote:
typically stupid crap
>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:03:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote:
inane drivel
which brings us to:
__ __ ___ _ __
/ / ___ ________/ / / _ \___ _(_)__/ /__ ____
/ /__/ _ `/ __/ _ / / , _/ _ `/ / _ / -_) __/
/____/\_,_/_/ \_,_/ /_/|_|\_,_/_/\_,_/\__/_/
_ _____
| |/ (_-<
|___/___/
__ ___ __ __
___/ /______/ (_)__ / /__ ___ __ _____/ /
/ _ / __/ _ / / _ \/ '_// _ \/ // / _ /
\_,_/_/ \_,_/_/_//_/_/\_\/ .__/\_,_/\_,_/
/_/
_ _ _
__| |_ __ _ _ _ _ _(_)_ _ __ _ (_)_ _
(_-< _/ _` | '_| '_| | ' \/ _` | | | ' \
/__/\__\__,_|_| |_| |_|_||_\__, | |_|_||_|
|___/
_____ _ _ _ _
/__ \_ __ ___ | | | __ _| |_| |__ ___ _ __
/ /\/ '__/ _ \| | |/ _` | __| '_ \ / _ \| '_ \
/ / | | | (_) | | | (_| | |_| | | | (_) | | | |
\/ |_| \___/|_|_|\__,_|\__|_| |_|\___/|_| |_|
____ ___ ___ ____
|___ \ / _ \ / _ \___ \
__) | | | | | | |__) |
/ __/| |_| | |_| / __/
|_____|\___/ \___/_____|
____ __ __ ___
/\ _`\ /\ \__/\ \__/\_ \
\ \ \L\ \ __ \ \ ,_\ \ ,_\//\ \ __
\ \ _ <' /'__`\ \ \ \/\ \ \/ \ \ \ /'__`\
\ \ \L\ \/\ \L\.\_\ \ \_\ \ \_ \_\ \_/\ __/
\ \____/\ \__/.\_\\ \__\\ \__\/\____\ \____\
\/___/ \/__/\/_/ \/__/ \/__/\/____/\/____/
___ __
/'___\ __/\ \__
___ /\ \__/ __ __ __/\_\ \ ,_\
/ __`\ \ ,__\ /\ \/\ \/\ \/\ \ \ \/
/\ \L\ \ \ \_/ \ \ \_/ \_/ \ \ \ \ \_
\ \____/\ \_\ \ \___x___/'\ \_\ \__\
\/___/ \/_/ the \/__//__/ \/_/\/__/ less
_
_|_|_ o _ _|_ o __ _ o _|_ _ _|_ _ __
|_| | | _> |_ | |||(/_ | |__> | (_) |
_ _ |
_ | | _|_|_ _ | \/ \|_| |
(_| | | |_| |(/_ |_/\_/| | o
On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote in message <3c77bbf4.10347065@205.158.27.245>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:02:32 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >typically stupid crap >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:03:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >inane drivel >which brings us to: > __ __ ___ _ __ > / / ___ ________/ / / _ \___ _(_)__/ /__ ____ > / /__/ _ `/ __/ _ / / , _/ _ `/ / _ / -_) __/ > /____/\_,_/_/ \_,_/ /_/|_|\_,_/_/\_,_/\__/_/ > > _ _____ > | |/ (_-< > |___/___/ > > __ ___ __ __ > ___/ /______/ (_)__ / /__ ___ __ _____/ / > / _ / __/ _ / / _ \/ '_// _ \/ // / _ / > \_,_/_/ \_,_/_/_//_/_/\_\/ .__/\_,_/\_,_/ > /_/ > > > _ _ _ > __| |_ __ _ _ _ _ _(_)_ _ __ _ (_)_ _ > (_-< _/ _` | '_| '_| | ' \/ _` | | | ' \ > /__/\__\__,_|_| |_| |_|_||_\__, | |_|_||_| > |___/ > > _____ _ _ _ _ > /__ \_ __ ___ | | | __ _| |_| |__ ___ _ __ > / /\/ '__/ _ \| | |/ _` | __| '_ \ / _ \| '_ \ > / / | | | (_) | | | (_| | |_| | | | (_) | | | | > \/ |_| \___/|_|_|\__,_|\__|_| |_|\___/|_| |_| > ____ ___ ___ ____ > |___ \ / _ \ / _ \___ \ > __) | | | | | | |__) | > / __/| |_| | |_| / __/ > |_____|\___/ \___/_____| > > > > ____ __ __ ___ > /\ _`\ /\ \__/\ \__/\_ \ > \ \ \L\ \ __ \ \ ,_\ \ ,_\//\ \ __ > \ \ _ <' /'__`\ \ \ \/\ \ \/ \ \ \ /'__`\ > \ \ \L\ \/\ \L\.\_\ \ \_\ \ \_ \_\ \_/\ __/ > \ \____/\ \__/.\_\\ \__\\ \__\/\____\ \____\ > \/___/ \/__/\/_/ \/__/ \/__/\/____/\/____/ > > > ___ __ > /'___\ __/\ \__ > ___ /\ \__/ __ __ __/\_\ \ ,_\ > / __`\ \ ,__\ /\ \/\ \/\ \/\ \ \ \/ > /\ \L\ \ \ \_/ \ \ \_/ \_/ \ \ \ \ \_ > \ \____/\ \_\ \ \___x___/'\ \_\ \__\ > \/___/ \/_/ the \/__//__/ \/_/\/__/ less > > > _ > _|_|_ o _ _|_ o __ _ o _|_ _ _|_ _ __ > |_| | | _> |_ | |||(/_ | |__> | (_) | > _ _ | > _ | | _|_|_ _ | \/ \|_| | > (_| | | |_| |(/_ |_/\_/| | o shut up...! -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:25:57 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in message <75r...@4ax.com>: >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist >> .,,,. >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. >Way to go, Annie! stop encouraging the pedophile... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> skrev i meddelandet news:r1n...@4ax.com... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:25:57 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in > message <75r...@4ax.com>: > >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist > >> .,,,. > >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' > >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a > >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can > >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. > >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. > >Way to go, Annie! > > stop encouraging the pedophile... Way to go, pedophile! -jg
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:50:53 +0100, "Joaquim G�ndara" <cla...@lords.com> wrote in message <a58oc8$5lagl$1...@ID-102694.news.dfncis.de>: >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> skrev i meddelandet >news:r1n...@4ax.com... >> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:25:57 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in >> message <75r...@4ax.com>: >> >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist >> >> .,,,. >> >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >> >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >> >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >> >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >> >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. >> >Way to go, Annie! >> stop encouraging the pedophile... >Way to go, pedophile! you support pedophilia...? -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist > .,,,. > #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. Way to go, Annie! Nat
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:14 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <2sr...@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:02:32 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:03:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> >>wrote in message <t53...@4ax.com>: >>>Or Opera with the images turned off, or Netscape with javascript turned >>>off, or IE with java turned off, or IE when it's putting pink stripes >>>across images, >>i'm not interested in people who screw their browser settings up... >No, those are perfectly legitimate browser settings. no, they're not... nobody turns off picture display except the clueless... >>>or an old browser that doesn't understand certain tags, >>not a proper browser then... >Of course it is. If you're using non-standard specialised tags, you can >have no complaints about your site rendering incorrectly. I use HTML 4.0... >>only the latest version of a browser is a "proper" one... >That shows how much you know about HTML. I know it very well indeed as a matter of fact... and I use a minimal subset... certainly frames are out of the question...! >>>or someone viewing in 4-bit colour etc etc etc... >>i don't give a fuck what the idiots have done to fuck their PCs up... >They've fucked up their PCs because they don't render your non-standard, >fucked-up website? I supose your idea of a good web site is 500MB of java. my idea of a great web site is minimal graphics and PHP scripting... the less javascript the better... and no java at all... my site is 1.4MB and you can view it here: http://www.adderleystreet.co.za -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:18 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <g0s...@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:50:53 +0100, in alt.ascii-art, > ("Joaquim G�ndara" <cla...@lords.com>) wrote: >>"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> skrev i meddelandet >>news:r1n...@4ax.com... >>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:25:57 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in >>> message <75r...@4ax.com>: >>> >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist >>> >> .,,,. >>> >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >>> >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >>> >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >>> >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >>> >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. >>> >Way to go, Annie! >>> stop encouraging the pedophile... >>Way to go, pedophile! >It's spelt "paedophile". limeys spell it paedophile, yanks spell it pedophile... since I'm South African, I should spell it like the brits, but wtf it's easier the yank way... i'm gonna start dropping my 'u's too next... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 00:01:28 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <in9...@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:51:57 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:14 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> >>wrote in message <2sr...@4ax.com>: >>>>i'm not interested in people who screw their browser settings up... >>>No, those are perfectly legitimate browser settings. >>no, they're not... nobody turns off picture display except the clueless... >Or people who don't like their bandwidth and screen been wasted by >countless ads and colourful borders. well they're worms... fuck 'em... >>>>>or an old browser that doesn't understand certain tags, >>>>not a proper browser then... >>>Of course it is. If you're using non-standard specialised tags, you can >>>have no complaints about your site rendering incorrectly. >>I use HTML 4.0... >Which version? The standard version or the MS version? there is only one version of HTML 4.0... accept no M$ substitutes... >>>They've fucked up their PCs because they don't render your non-standard, >>>fucked-up website? I supose your idea of a good web site is 500MB of java. >>my idea of a great web site is minimal graphics and PHP scripting... the >>less javascript the better... and no java at all... >>my site is 1.4MB and you can view it here: >>http://www.adderleystreet.co.za >I'm not blind you know, I don't need size 50 letters. well you got 'em anyway... >That site hurts my eyes. I dig it... >And what's with the horizontal links? Links should be in a verticle >list. It's easier for the eyes to follow, and for the mouse to move >accross. i prefer horizontal links... vertical links suck big time... take up valuable screen real estate... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 00:01:30 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <fr9...@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:56:55 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:18 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> >>wrote in message <g0s...@4ax.com>: >>>>> >> .,,,. >>>>> >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' >>>>> >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a >>>>> >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can >>>>> >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. >>>>> >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. >>>>> >Way to go, Annie! >>>>> stop encouraging the pedophile... >>>>Way to go, pedophile! >>>It's spelt "paedophile". >>limeys spell it paedophile, yanks spell it pedophile... >>since I'm South African, I should spell it like the brits, but wtf it's >>easier the yank way... i'm gonna start dropping my 'u's too next... >And maybe one day your bollocks will drop. tell that to the 9yo whose pussy i ripped open this afternoon... little fucker is still bleeding in my basement... should give her some food and water soon... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:16:23 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in message <d5j...@4ax.com>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:01:29 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> >wrote: >>clearly a dumb Canuck is too clueless to realise that we don't use AOL in >>South Africa... >>Hell, you prolly think I'm a yank... >You are BOTH rude! makes you wanna fuck me, doesn't it...? btw upgrade your agent to 1.9... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:01:29 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >clearly a dumb Canuck is too clueless to realise that we don't use AOL in >South Africa... > >Hell, you prolly think I'm a yank... You are BOTH rude! Nat
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:08:45 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote >in message <3c77bbf4.10347065@205.158.27.245>: >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:02:32 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >>typically stupid crap >>>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:03:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >>inane drivel >>which brings us to: >> __ __ ___ _ __ >> / / ___ ________/ / / _ \___ _(_)__/ /__ ____ >> / /__/ _ `/ __/ _ / / , _/ _ `/ / _ / -_) __/ >> /____/\_,_/_/ \_,_/ /_/|_|\_,_/_/\_,_/\__/_/ >> >> _ _____ >> | |/ (_-< >> |___/___/ >> >> __ ___ __ __ >> ___/ /______/ (_)__ / /__ ___ __ _____/ / >> / _ / __/ _ / / _ \/ '_// _ \/ // / _ / >> \_,_/_/ \_,_/_/_//_/_/\_\/ .__/\_,_/\_,_/ >> /_/ >> >> >> _ _ _ >> __| |_ __ _ _ _ _ _(_)_ _ __ _ (_)_ _ >> (_-< _/ _` | '_| '_| | ' \/ _` | | | ' \ >> /__/\__\__,_|_| |_| |_|_||_\__, | |_|_||_| >> |___/ >> >> _____ _ _ _ _ >> /__ \_ __ ___ | | | __ _| |_| |__ ___ _ __ >> / /\/ '__/ _ \| | |/ _` | __| '_ \ / _ \| '_ \ >> / / | | | (_) | | | (_| | |_| | | | (_) | | | | >> \/ |_| \___/|_|_|\__,_|\__|_| |_|\___/|_| |_| >> ____ ___ ___ ____ >> |___ \ / _ \ / _ \___ \ >> __) | | | | | | |__) | >> / __/| |_| | |_| / __/ >> |_____|\___/ \___/_____| >> >> >> >> ____ __ __ ___ >> /\ _`\ /\ \__/\ \__/\_ \ >> \ \ \L\ \ __ \ \ ,_\ \ ,_\//\ \ __ >> \ \ _ <' /'__`\ \ \ \/\ \ \/ \ \ \ /'__`\ >> \ \ \L\ \/\ \L\.\_\ \ \_\ \ \_ \_\ \_/\ __/ >> \ \____/\ \__/.\_\\ \__\\ \__\/\____\ \____\ >> \/___/ \/__/\/_/ \/__/ \/__/\/____/\/____/ >> >> >> ___ __ >> /'___\ __/\ \__ >> ___ /\ \__/ __ __ __/\_\ \ ,_\ >> / __`\ \ ,__\ /\ \/\ \/\ \/\ \ \ \/ >> /\ \L\ \ \ \_/ \ \ \_/ \_/ \ \ \ \ \_ >> \ \____/\ \_\ \ \___x___/'\ \_\ \__\ >> \/___/ \/_/ the \/__//__/ \/_/\/__/ less >> >> >> _ >> _|_|_ o _ _|_ o __ _ o _|_ _ _|_ _ __ >> |_| | | _> |_ | |||(/_ | |__> | (_) | >> _ _ | >> _ | | _|_|_ _ | \/ \|_| | >> (_| | | |_| |(/_ |_/\_/| | o > >shut up...! make me
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:16 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, > (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: > ><snip> > >That writing is practically unreadable. > Thank You! (btw you have just urinated on your shoes)
>makes you wanna fuck me, doesn't it...?
A sick jerk.
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:ihg...@4ax.com... > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:54:02 +0100, "Sebastian Pe�a Saldarriaga" > <seb...@free.fr> wrote in message > <a55ct5$4ovg5$1...@ID-126266.news.dfncis.de>: > >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message > >news:2ac...@4ax.com... > >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in > >message > >> <8jh...@4ax.com>: > >> >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat > >gobhole...? > >> >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > >> >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? > >> >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... > >> >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > >> why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you wanted > >to > >> talk to me...? > >> in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... > > Should we have the honour of seeing yours first? > > you like seeing male breasts...? > > faggot...! I thought you were a girl you know..... I'm so sorry!!! -- .|. (*.*) /* My sig delimiter is broken */ -
On 24 Feb 2002 03:18:34 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote in message <3c785b42.1558970@205.158.27.245>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:08:45 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >>On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote >>in message <3c77bbf4.10347065@205.158.27.245>: >>>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 16:02:32 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >>>typically stupid crap >>>>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:03:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >>>inane drivel >>>which brings us to: >>> __ __ ___ _ __ >>> / / ___ ________/ / / _ \___ _(_)__/ /__ ____ >>> / /__/ _ `/ __/ _ / / , _/ _ `/ / _ / -_) __/ >>> /____/\_,_/_/ \_,_/ /_/|_|\_,_/_/\_,_/\__/_/ >>> >>> _ _____ >>> | |/ (_-< >>> |___/___/ >>> >>> __ ___ __ __ >>> ___/ /______/ (_)__ / /__ ___ __ _____/ / >>> / _ / __/ _ / / _ \/ '_// _ \/ // / _ / >>> \_,_/_/ \_,_/_/_//_/_/\_\/ .__/\_,_/\_,_/ >>> /_/ >>> >>> >>> _ _ _ >>> __| |_ __ _ _ _ _ _(_)_ _ __ _ (_)_ _ >>> (_-< _/ _` | '_| '_| | ' \/ _` | | | ' \ >>> /__/\__\__,_|_| |_| |_|_||_\__, | |_|_||_| >>> |___/ >>> >>> _____ _ _ _ _ >>> /__ \_ __ ___ | | | __ _| |_| |__ ___ _ __ >>> / /\/ '__/ _ \| | |/ _` | __| '_ \ / _ \| '_ \ >>> / / | | | (_) | | | (_| | |_| | | | (_) | | | | >>> \/ |_| \___/|_|_|\__,_|\__|_| |_|\___/|_| |_| >>> ____ ___ ___ ____ >>> |___ \ / _ \ / _ \___ \ >>> __) | | | | | | |__) | >>> / __/| |_| | |_| / __/ >>> |_____|\___/ \___/_____| >>> >>> >>> >>> ____ __ __ ___ >>> /\ _`\ /\ \__/\ \__/\_ \ >>> \ \ \L\ \ __ \ \ ,_\ \ ,_\//\ \ __ >>> \ \ _ <' /'__`\ \ \ \/\ \ \/ \ \ \ /'__`\ >>> \ \ \L\ \/\ \L\.\_\ \ \_\ \ \_ \_\ \_/\ __/ >>> \ \____/\ \__/.\_\\ \__\\ \__\/\____\ \____\ >>> \/___/ \/__/\/_/ \/__/ \/__/\/____/\/____/ >>> >>> >>> ___ __ >>> /'___\ __/\ \__ >>> ___ /\ \__/ __ __ __/\_\ \ ,_\ >>> / __`\ \ ,__\ /\ \/\ \/\ \/\ \ \ \/ >>> /\ \L\ \ \ \_/ \ \ \_/ \_/ \ \ \ \ \_ >>> \ \____/\ \_\ \ \___x___/'\ \_\ \__\ >>> \/___/ \/_/ the \/__//__/ \/_/\/__/ less >>> >>> >>> _ >>> _|_|_ o _ _|_ o __ _ o _|_ _ _|_ _ __ >>> |_| | | _> |_ | |||(/_ | |__> | (_) | >>> _ _ | >>> _ | | _|_|_ _ | \/ \|_| | >>> (_| | | |_| |(/_ |_/\_/| | o >>shut up...! >make me no... now whatcha gonna do, Californian...? -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On 24 Feb 2002 03:19:22 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote in message <3c785b62.1590395@205.158.27.245>: >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:16 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >>On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, >> (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: >>That writing is practically unreadable. > Thank You! (btw you have just urinated on your shoes) show some respect... or we'll blast CA into the sea... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:46:54 -0800, Nat <NOS...@centurytel.net> wrote in message <e1s...@4ax.com>: >>makes you wanna fuck me, doesn't it...? >A sick jerk. don't be like that... you know I'll be gentle... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:44:07 +0100, "Sebastian Pe�a Saldarriaga" <seb...@free.fr> wrote in message <a5acob$5o80r$1...@ID-126266.news.dfncis.de>: >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message >news:ihg...@4ax.com... >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:54:02 +0100, "Sebastian Pe�a Saldarriaga" >> <seb...@free.fr> wrote in message >> <a55ct5$4ovg5$1...@ID-126266.news.dfncis.de>: >> >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message >> >news:2ac...@4ax.com... >> >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in >> >message >> >> <8jh...@4ax.com>: >> >> >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat >> >gobhole...? >> >> >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! >> >> >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? >> >> >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... >> >> >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? >> >> why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you >wanted to talk to me...? >> >> in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... >> > Should we have the honour of seeing yours first? >> you like seeing male breasts...? >> faggot...! > I thought you were a girl you know..... > I'm so sorry!!! heh... i pardon you... just this once... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:51:47 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >On 24 Feb 2002 03:19:22 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote >in message <3c785b62.1590395@205.158.27.245>: >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:16 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >>>On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, >>> (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: >>>That writing is practically unreadable. >> Thank You! (btw you have just urinated on your shoes) > >show some respect... or we'll blast CA into the sea... > with your high powered dart gun, right?
On 24 Feb 2002 12:30:30 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote in message <3c78dc3b.862421@205.158.27.245>: >On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:51:47 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: >>On 24 Feb 2002 03:19:22 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote >>in message <3c785b62.1590395@205.158.27.245>: >>>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:16 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >>>>On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, >>>> (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: >>>>That writing is practically unreadable. >>> Thank You! (btw you have just urinated on your shoes) >>show some respect... or we'll blast CA into the sea... >with your high powered dart gun, right? quit reading my mind... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:34:48 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote in message <a1l...@4ax.com>: >On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 02:24:27 +0200, in alt.ascii-art, > (Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com>) wrote: >>On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 00:01:28 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> >>wrote in message <in9...@4ax.com>: >>>Or people who don't like their bandwidth and screen been wasted by >>>countless ads and colourful borders. >>well they're worms... fuck 'em... >You appear to be wrong in the head. i am... thanks for noticing... >>>Which version? The standard version or the MS version? >>there is only one version of HTML 4.0... accept no M$ substitutes... >Tell that to sites that only work on IE. yeh... well i'm switching opera now... >>>And what's with the horizontal links? Links should be in a verticle >>>list. It's easier for the eyes to follow, and for the mouse to move >>>accross. >>i prefer horizontal links... vertical links suck big time... take up >>valuable screen real estate... >No they don't. Not if you have them in a nice list on the left. well you do that for your site... -- I am your father www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:34:49 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >On 24 Feb 2002 03:19:22 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, > (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: > >>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:16 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: >> >>>On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, >>> (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: >>> >>><snip> >>> >>>That writing is practically unreadable. >>> >> Thank You! (btw you have just urinated on your shoes) > >No I haven't. I'm not wearing any shoes. you have the worst case of athletes foot ever, but urinating on it wont help
On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Phydeaux wrote: > "Taliszanna" wrote... > <diddle> > ____________________________________________ > .|=====| - WHAT THE ?!?!! > :\ /. > / /\ \: > ( II) ) > \ `-._/: . > . /\.//#: : > : /\II\#/\ > :/`#II \##\ > /##/II \#/ > \#/ II > II > II > II > II > II ***BBBBBBRRRRRRIII- > II IIINNNNNGGGGGG!!!*** > ][ > /, \ > `I)') > ^ / / > (_~, > (_.) > (_ , > (_') > /TT > oo'`II > II > II > II > ,"^^". > -- ` `-------------------------------------- > > </diddle> > > -Phydeaux That's hilarious, phydeaux! I'd be freaking if there was a big snake on the pole and I was a firefighter on the way down! -tali
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:i6o...@4ax.com... > On 24 Feb 2002 12:30:30 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote > in message <3c78dc3b.862421@205.158.27.245>: > >On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:51:47 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: > >>On 24 Feb 2002 03:19:22 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote > >>in message <3c785b62.1590395@205.158.27.245>: > >>>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:16 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: > >>>>On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, > >>>> (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: > >>>>That writing is practically unreadable. > >>> Thank You! (btw you have just urinated on your shoes) > >>show some respect... or we'll blast CA into the sea... > >with your high powered dart gun, right? > > quit reading my mind... > > -- > I am your father > www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php yer mind is an open book..... -- Richard Catto - as seen on:- http://www.gaynetcapetown.co.za/personals/default.asp PO BOX 16148, Vlaeberg, 8018, or, 301 Son Vida, Somerset Road, Green Point, 8005. Phone: +27 21 712 0840
"Lard Vader" <lar...@adderleystreet.co.za> wrote in message news:3c7b10dc$1_...@mk-nntp-1.news.uk.worldonline.com... : : "Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message : news:i6o...@4ax.com... : > On 24 Feb 2002 12:30:30 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) : wrote : > in message <3c78dc3b.862421@205.158.27.245>: : > >On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:51:47 +0200, Lord Vader : <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote: : > >>On 24 Feb 2002 03:19:22 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) : wrote : > >>in message <3c785b62.1590395@205.158.27.245>: : > >>>On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:16 +0000 (UTC), drsquare : <now...@nowhere.co.uk> wrote: : > >>>>On 23 Feb 2002 15:59:36 GMT, in alt.ascii-art, : > >>>> (mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP)) wrote: : > >>>>That writing is practically unreadable. : > >>> Thank You! (btw you have just urinated on your shoes) : > >>show some respect... or we'll blast CA into the sea... : > >with your high powered dart gun, right? : > : > quit reading my mind... : > : > -- : > I am your father : > www.adderleystreet.co.za/atjfaq.php : : yer mind is an open book..... Misspelled...... "miss-fortune cookie"
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:krc...@4ax.com... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 18:16:23 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in > message <d5j...@4ax.com>: > >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:01:29 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> > >wrote: > >>clearly a dumb Canuck is too clueless to realise that we don't use AOL in > >>South Africa... > >>Hell, you prolly think I'm a yank... > >You are BOTH rude! > > makes you wanna fuck me, doesn't it...? btw upgrade your agent to 1.9... makes us want to fuck with yer mind.... and that's what we are doing..... (\_----_/) /`` ```` ``\ | {o} {o} | \ (..) / Oink Oink Porky !!! `. -- .` ``````
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:36e...@4ax.com... > On Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:44:07 +0100, "Sebastian Pe�a Saldarriaga" > <seb...@free.fr> wrote in message > <a5acob$5o80r$1...@ID-126266.news.dfncis.de>: > >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message > >news:ihg...@4ax.com... > >> On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:54:02 +0100, "Sebastian Pe�a Saldarriaga" > >> <seb...@free.fr> wrote in message > >> <a55ct5$4ovg5$1...@ID-126266.news.dfncis.de>: > >> >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message > >> >news:2ac...@4ax.com... > >> >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in > >> >message > >> >> <8jh...@4ax.com>: > >> >> >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat > >> >gobhole...? > >> >> >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > >> >> >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? > >> >> >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... > >> >> >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > >> >> why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you > >wanted to talk to me...? > >> >> in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... > >> > Should we have the honour of seeing yours first? > >> you like seeing male breasts...? > >> faggot...! > > I thought you were a girl you know..... > > I'm so sorry!!! > > heh... i pardon you... just this once... > .,,,,,,. (((`````) yer still gone get executed Richard ! )))-(o)(o) (( ._) __/ )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:ihg...@4ax.com... > On Fri, 22 Feb 2002 12:54:02 +0100, "Sebastian Pe�a Saldarriaga" > <seb...@free.fr> wrote in message > <a55ct5$4ovg5$1...@ID-126266.news.dfncis.de>: > >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message > >news:2ac...@4ax.com... > >> On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in > >message > >> <8jh...@4ax.com>: > >> >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat > >gobhole...? > >> >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > >> >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? > >> >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... > >> >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > >> why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you wanted > >to > >> talk to me...? > >> in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... > > Should we have the honour of seeing yours first? > > you like seeing male breasts...? > > faggot...! > > -- > I am your father .,,,,,,. (((`````) Well, yours sure are big enough Richard !! )))-(o)(o) (( ._) __/ )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:2ac...@4ax.com... > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in message > <8jh...@4ax.com>: > >>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? > >>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > >>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? > >>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... > >U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > > why are you addressing the group as a whole now...? i thought you wanted to > talk to me...? .,,,,,,. (((`````) No one really wants you here )))-(o)(o) (( ._) __/ )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____) > in any case, show me yer tits, and then I'll answer your questions... .,,,,,,. (((`````) Your tits are bigger !! show us them ! )))-(o)(o) (( ._) __/ )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:5em...@4ax.com... > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:36:54 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in message > <bpq...@4ax.com>: > >On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 02:15:48 +0200, Lord Vader <vad...@empire.starwars.com> > >wrote: > >>do I ruin your "fun"...? hope so... > >Typical insecure juvenile response. .,,,,,,. (((`````) )))-(o)(o) You wouldn't believe Richard was (( ._) __/ in his mid 30's )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____) > > i can see you take this _very_ seriously... how sad... .,,,,,,. (((`````) )))-(o)(o) You are the saddist of the lot here! (( ._) __/ )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:l0f...@4ax.com... > On Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:14:23 GMT, oll...@pp.inet.fi (Olli Wilkman) > wrote in message <3c7...@news.inet.fi>: > > In: alt.ascii-art > > On: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:00:06 -0800 > > From: Nat <non...@century.net> > >(fixed top-post for clarity) > >>>>>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? > >>>>>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > >>>>Are you a jerk or just pretending? > >>>show me yer tits and i'll tell you... > >>U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > >>Nat > >Yes. > > Liar... > > >But there are a few loud adolescents who ruin the fun for the rest > >of us :/ > > do I ruin your "fun"...? hope so... .,,,,,,. (((`````) )))-(o)(o) Are we ruining yours ??? (( ._) __/ )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:8p5...@4ax.com... > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 21:15:32 -0800, Nat <non...@century.net> wrote in message > <k6c...@4ax.com>: > >>you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? > >>fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > >Are you a jerk or just pretending? > > show me yer tits and i'll tell you... > .,,,,,,. (((`````) )))-(o)(o) After you, yer faggot ! (( ._) __/ )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:l1e...@4ax.com... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:46:54 -0800, Nat <NOS...@centurytel.net> wrote in > message <e1s...@4ax.com>: > >>makes you wanna fuck me, doesn't it...? > >A sick jerk. > > don't be like that... you know I'll be gentle... > .,,,,,,. (((`````) Big Pete Says:- )))-(o)(o) As gentle as a steam roller (( ._) __/ running over a headgehog ! )_ _< _ / _\_ | | ( (_____)3_| \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:kem...@4ax.com... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 05:01:26 GMT, ttu...@ecn.ab.ca () wrote in message > <GmFd8.1154$NZ5.95329@localhost>: > >Lord Vader (vad...@empire.starwars.com) wrote: > >: On 19 Feb 2002 20:14:41 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) wrote > >: in message <3c72b153.17728025@205.158.27.245>: > >: >>Lord Vader > ><snip> > >: or... thinking harder... the person asking the question has AOL... the > >: person "answering" does not even have AOL... ergo, it stands to reason they > >: know less... > ><snip> > >--> As if any AOLer knows dick. Not `even' having AOL, is a PLUS. > > But then, you probably _DO_ have AOL. You have my sympathies. > > I think I see your problem: > NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.161.206.2 > IP resolves to: freenet.edmonton.ab.ca > > clearly a dumb Canuck is too clueless to realise that we don't use AOL in > South Africa... > > Hell, you prolly think I'm a yank... > > *** > > the AOLer is a clueless cretin too, but you just demonstrated that not > having AOL does not qualify you for much either... > .,,,,,,. _________________________________ (((`````) | )))-(o)(o) | You're the biggest clueless (( ._) __/ cretin on this group Richard, )_ _< _ \ Now, please, go slit yer wrists / _\_ | | | and save us the trip ( (_____)3_| |_________________________________ \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:r70...@4ax.com... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 20:01:18 +0000 (UTC), drsquare <now...@nowhere.co.uk> > wrote in message <g0s...@4ax.com>: > >On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:50:53 +0100, in alt.ascii-art, > > ("Joaquim G�ndara" <cla...@lords.com>) wrote: > >>"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> skrev i meddelandet > >>news:r1n...@4ax.com... > >>> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:25:57 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in > >>> message <75r...@4ax.com>: > >>> >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist > >>> >> .,,,. > >>> >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' > >>> >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a > >>> >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can > >>> >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. > >>> >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. > >>> >Way to go, Annie! > >>> stop encouraging the pedophile... > >>Way to go, pedophile! > >It's spelt "paedophile". > > limeys spell it paedophile, yanks spell it pedophile... > > since I'm South African, I should spell it like the brits, but wtf it's > easier the yank way... i'm gonna start dropping my 'u's too next... .,,,,,,. _________________________________ (((`````) | )))-(o)(o) | Whatever way you spell it, (( ._) __/ it still means the same thing, )_ _< _ \ and you're the pedophile in / _\_ | | | this group ! ( (_____)3_| |_________________________________ \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:ijg...@4ax.com... > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC), "Laury" <gni...@moc.tenretnitb> > wrote in message <a4uamq$lab$1...@helle.btinternet.com>: > >Lord Vader > >| >at least they tried to help > >| because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try > >to help you but > >| actually know less about it than you do... > >Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept. > > show us yer tits, laury... > .,,,,,,. _________________________________ (((`````) | )))-(o)(o) | hehe... look at yer own (( ._) __/ yer faggot !!!!! )_ _< _ \ / _\_ | | | ( (_____)3_| |_________________________________ \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Nat" <non...@century.net> wrote in message news:8jh...@4ax.com... > U'h, excuse me....are there any grownups here? > Nat > .,,,,,,. _________________________________ (((`````) | )))-(o)(o) | (( ._) __/ the simple answer is NO ! )_ _< _ \ not when Lord Vader is about / _\_ | | | ( (_____)3_| |_________________________________ \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:2t4...@4ax.com... > On Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:18:30 +0400, "Poster" <Pos...@NoSpam.net> wrote in > message <a52703$b2c...@OM9.omantel.net.om>: > >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message > >news:kkg...@4ax.com... > >> On 19 Feb 2002 20:14:41 GMT, mik...@bluedwarf.spam.net (MJP) > >> >On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 19:57:14 +0000 (UTC), "Laury" > ><gni...@moc.tenretnitb> wrote: > >> >>Lord Vader > >> >>| >at least they tried to help > >> >>| because they want to feel important... i hate idiots who try > >> >>to help you but > >> >>| actually know less about it than you do... > >> >>Less than zero knowledge? That's an interesting concept. > >> >It's troll math, sort of like the accounting style of Enron Corp. > >> or... thinking harder... the person asking the question has AOL... the > >> person "answering" does not even have AOL... ergo, it stands to reason > >they > >> know less... > >and there are people who talk about FRAMES and WebSites while they still use > >LYNX!!! and not even a Proper Browser..... TADA!!!!! WOW!! What a concept!!! > > yep... they're morons too... like you... > .,,,,,,. _________________________________ (((`````) | )))-(o)(o) | So, you don't consider yerself (( ._) __/ a moron then Richard ??? )_ _< _ \ / _\_ | | | ( (_____)3_| |_________________________________ \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:sjp...@4ax.com... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 19:50:53 +0100, "Joaquim G�ndara" <cla...@lords.com> wrote > in message <a58oc8$5lagl$1...@ID-102694.news.dfncis.de>: > >"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> skrev i meddelandet > >news:r1n...@4ax.com... > >> On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:25:57 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in > >> message <75r...@4ax.com>: > >> >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist > >> >> .,,,. > >> >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' > >> >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a > >> >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can > >> >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. > >> >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. > >> >Way to go, Annie! > >> stop encouraging the pedophile... > >Way to go, pedophile! > > you support pedophilia...? > .,,,,,,. _________________________________ (((`````) | )))-(o)(o) | Why ?? you hoping to swap (( ._) __/ pics or something ?? )_ _< _ \ / _\_ | | | ( (_____)3_| |_________________________________ \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
"Lord Vader" <vad...@empire.starwars.com> wrote in message news:r1n...@4ax.com... > On Sat, 23 Feb 2002 11:25:57 -0800, Nat <nat...@centurytel.net> wrote in > message <75r...@4ax.com>: > >>Annie Ascii -- budding 14-year-old ASCII artist > >> .,,,. > >> #### #### (~~~))) Lynx =is= a 'Proper Browser.' > >>## ## ## ## _ _ ((() / Besides, frames aren't a > >>###### ###### (^ )))) problem for Lynx. It can > >>## ## ## ## ~_((((() access 'framed' websites. > >>## ## ## ## / )))))) I'm a Net geek, and I know. > >Way to go, Annie! > > stop encouraging the pedophile... > .,,,,,,. _________________________________ (((`````) | )))-(o)(o) | Yeah, that'd be like taking (( ._) __/ your job away !! )_ _< _ \ / _\_ | | | ( (_____)3_| |_________________________________ \ ___ / ) /_\___ ))_ | |( )__) | |(____)
Lord Vader wrote: > > On 19 Feb 2002 00:49:43 GMT, the kat <nospam@127.0.0.1> wrote in message > <slr...@ryoko.CNS.cwru.edu>: > >In article <200...@mb-fv.aol.com>, Smishy20 wrote: > >> Can someone tell me how to put ascii art in my aol profile thank u > >well, ive never used aol, > > you don't know... so why don't you just shut your stupid fat gobhole...? > > fucking idjits who feel they need to spew meaningless crap...! > > -- > I am your father Dad, you suck. | \ Aargh... an other \ conflict of generations. \ \ `, \ o o # /_,/\ |/ ? /" ( | = )\ .Y___ / /__/\ \____ \(__ ,- / \_/ \ / (\ |/| / < _____ _> \ |. ||\ -|.|--/___/ ,___/___\------'-----' '-' |\/ b'ger joris
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 12:55:57 +0100, joris bellenger <svz...@xs4all.nl> wrote: > > >Lord Vader wrote: [...] >> >> -- >> I am your father > > Dad, you suck. > | > \ Aargh... an other > \ conflict of generations. > \ \ > `, \ > o o # /_,/\ > |/ ? /" ( > | = )\ .Y___ / > /__/\ \____ \(__ > ,- / \_/ \ / (\ > |/| / < _____ _> \ |. ||\ > -|.|--/___/ ,___/___\------'-----' > '-' |\/ b'ger > >joris -lol- nice one :) -- ' + ` . ,-------------. + . ` . * ' \/ * . __ . ( alt.ascii-art ) . . ,-----------. ` (oO) -._'"- ( ,. _.' `-------------' ' ( you said it )_,' vv . `" `-` . ' * ` + `-----------' . JL
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this thread.
These messages were posted publicly to the newsgroup
alt.ascii-art
in 2002 and are mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you one of the authors? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.