Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 16 Aug 1998.
Re: Munging e-mail addresses (was: Re: I'm having problems.

Re: Munging e-mail addresses (was: Re: I'm having problems. [& 6-line PIC])

.----- On Sun, 16 Aug 1998 01:27:21 +1200, Matthew Thomas posted:
|
|Ok Colin, let's do a little comparison. llizard's address, like mine, is
|munged to prevent spammers. Can somebody e-mail us? Yes, if they have an
|IQ of about 95 or above (which rules out idiots as well as spam-bots).
|Now, you don't munge your e-mail address, but it is spam-blocked. Can
|anyone e-mail you? No. Even if they're really clever? No.
|
|> Normally I don't want to email anyone...I say what I have to say in
|> public in the newsgroups and I have no particular wish for people to
|> email me about what I have written publicly. I have now wish to
|> engage in email exchanges which may, or may not, prove acrimonious.
|> If something cannot be said in public then it's probably best left
|> unsaid.
|
|I disagree. For example, Joris e-mailed me the other day to ask my
|permission for him to include some of the a.a-a FAQ on his Web site.
|Would that have been appropriate to post to a.a-a? No, because it was a
|private matter between the two of us, and it would have been quite
|boring to everyone else. So he unmunged my address, and e-mailed me.
|Simple. People who want to communicate with you privately have no such
|option.
|
'-------------------------

I agree fully with you Matthew. Unmunging of addresses is an easy task and
mungung is an effective way of stopping spamming (unless you have used the
raw, unmunged addy in the past). It is very useful sometimes to be able to
contact an ascii artist privatly, for congrats, permissions or even to say
'hi, how are you!' and other general messages just not appropriate to the
entirety of the group.

Although it`s not in my sig any more that my reply addy it ROT13`d, it`s
fairly obvious that it`s not a valid address. It takes someone with a
slightly better IQ to figure that one, but once you read my sig it`s pretty
obvious what my address is, unless you try to email
mar...@bigfoot.com ... that of course is silly! :o)

               ______
           . ' ____  `-._
        ,' _.-'    `, ._ `.
       / .'  ______/ /  '. \
      / /   (_____/ /_)   \ \
     ; ;    | S P/ /M |    ; ;
     | |    |   / /$&.|    | |
     | |    | @/ /***,|    | |
     ; ;    | / /-### |    ; ;
      \ \   `/ /------'   / /
       `.`. / /        _,' /
         ` . '--___--"' , '
     ak     `---___--"'


|\/| _..__|_o._   /\_|_| o._  _   mart.atkins@--
|  |(_||  |_|| | /--\|_|<|| |_>            --bigfoot.com

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,b1b9b850038ab5a6
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
From: zne...@ovtsbbg.pbz (Martin Atkins)
Subject: Re: Munging e-mail addresses (was: Re: I'm having problems. [& 6-line PIC])
Date: 1998/08/16
Message-ID: <35d...@news.vossnet.net>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 381541422
References: <35c...@news.teleglobe.net> <902...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <902...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <35D...@iNOdirect.ca> <902...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <35D...@iNOdirect.ca> <35d...@news.southern.co.nz> <35D...@iNOdirect.ca> <35D...@xs4all.nl> <903...@mnementh.southern.co.nz> <35D...@spamfree.land>
Organization: Cable Internet (post doesn't reflect views of Cable Internet)
Reply-To: zne...@ovtsbbg.pbz
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post