Talk-Line: Music staffs
From The Minstrel <Min...@vnet.ibm.com>
· rec.arts.ascii
· 12 Jan 1996 00:00 · View full thread
· report
In <4d31l5$1v...@miso.wwa.com>, Rosemary Lyndall Wemm <ros...@haywire.DIALix.COM> writes: > >On 10 Jan 1996, Bob Allison wrote: > >> For some time I have been using this as a sig in music newsgroups. I >> is the result of many diddlings. >> >> |\ __3__ | >> ____|) ______________|\\ ________| ____________' _| _` __| ________| __| _____ >> ____| ___3_|________@'_\| _|_____| ________|___| _| _| __| |_,@ ___| __| __|__ >> ___/|. __-_|___| _______| _|_____| __,@ ___|__@'_@'_@'___| |_| ___@'___| __|__ >> __( ( ) _4_|___| ______@'__|____O'___| ____|____________@'_|_| _______@'___|__ >> ___`|'_____|___| __________|_________| ____|_______________|_| ____________|__ >> (| O' | bob...@wwa.com > > [Snip] >Firstly, your bars do not all contain the equivalent of three crotchets: > > BAR No. CONTENTS BEATS > __ > | | | > 1 O' @' @' = 3 This seems to actually contain 2.5 beats (they look like semi-quavers to me) [Snip] > >Secondly, it is illegal to leap over the octave in a melodic line, >especially when the interval is a ninth and it is not resolved onto the >octave immediately. > These are the rules for (generally) writing four-part (or similar) _vocal_ harmony (simply because it is difficult to sing!). Otherwise, there's not a great problem - besides which, the rules were only originally devised so that examiners had something to assess papers by... >Thirdly, the piece is written in A minor and you have failed to include a >G# in the key signature. If it was, in fact, written in A Minor (and admittedly it does seem like it), the G# would not be in the key signature at all, but only exist as an accidental... > >Fourthly, except for the initial minum, all the notes come from the tonic >chord. > >Fifthly, speaking of the initial mimum, which we were, it comes on a >strong beat but the pitch is not a member of the tonic, or even of the >dominant chord. > [Minim] Again, if it is actually in A Minor. >Fifthly, you repeat notes across the bar line without ties. So? >Seventhly, as a somewhat minor point [since we were talking about minor >things), your melody has even less melodic merit than Gregorian Chant. I cannot disagree with this...! >How about the following for slightly more meritorious compositions? > >The Blue Da-nube: > Hmm... I've never been one for Strauss - I think I'll stick with Bob's in preference ;-) > > Original compost-ition. > Now, that's not bad. I would post something of my own, but I can't get any of it to look right in ASCII.... None of the above comments are intended to cause offense - in fact, I would be quite eager to discuss any gaps in my knowledge that are probably horribly obvious in all that I've said... Yours, striving for perfection, S Who C Wants to O Live Forever? P (Content in the knowledge that he's posting to completely the wrong Newsgroup. Ah, well...)
Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: fbb9d,b366fdba6431f3ec X-Google-Attributes: gidfbb9d,public From: Min...@vnet.ibm.com (The Minstrel) Subject: Talk-Line: Music staffs Date: 1996/01/12 Message-ID: <4d5n8k$kl...@miso.wwa.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 134946106 sender: bob...@sashimi.wwa.com references: <4d31l5$1v...@miso.wwa.com> organization: IBM Austin newsgroups: rec.arts.ascii
Related ASCII art in the Gallery
Explore these categories from our collection of 11,000+ artworks:
Make your own ASCII art
Turn images, text or 3D into ASCII, or draw your own – right in your browser.
About this message.
This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup
rec.arts.ascii
in 1996 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked.
The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can.
Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.
Report this message
Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.