Settings

The page will reload to apply your changes.
Theme

ASCII Art Font

ASCII Art Menu

Original Usenet message from alt.ascii-art, 16 Jan 1998.
Re: Naes of ASCII Symbols

Re: Naes of ASCII Symbols

In article <34B...@erols.com>, Robert Lieblich writes:
>Dammit, isn't anyone going to bust in and point out that in the US the 
>symbol # can represent the unit of weight named "pound"?  
>The symbol # in the US can represent the unit of weight named "pound." 
>And that, children, is why in the US the key on which the # symbol 
>appears is called the "pound key."

They already have.  The US usage of #1023 for "number" 1023 is not
shared abroad, and 15# for 15 "pounds" weight is unknown abroad.
Pounds weight in England and AFAIK Australia etc is "Lbs",
and we have a fancyL prefix in 'L'70 for 70 pounds money.

This is why "number", "hash"/"crosshatch", "gate" or "sharp" are
sensible names internationally, but "pound" isn't --- most people
outside America will think you mean a fancyL sign for pounds money.

In article <34b...@news.earthlink.net>, Robert Brody writes:
>I'm not familiar with telephones in Great Britain so I don't know what
>a touch tone phone in G.B. looks like.

Same as an American one:
  1 2 3
  4 5 6
  7 8 9
  * 0 #
My telephone operator say the official name for that key here is
either "hash" or "gate".  


                                            |~/           |~/
~~|;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;'^';-._.-;||';-._.-;'^';||_.-;'^'0-|~~
P |      Woof Woof, Glug Glug               ||____________||      0  | P
O |   Who Drowned the Judge's Dog?          | . . . . . . . '----. 0 | O
O |         answers on                  *---|_______________  @__o0  | O
L |{a href="news:alt.religion.scientology"}{/a}_____________|/_______| L
and{a href="http://www.xemu.demon.co.uk/clam/lynx/q0.html"}{/a}XemuSP4(:)

Original message headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: f996b,d8ba9ee032dffd44
X-Google-Attributes: gidf996b,public
X-Google-Thread: 113841,2e58d5f13e65ed35
X-Google-Attributes: gid113841,public
X-Google-Thread: 102ffd,2e58d5f13e65ed35
X-Google-Attributes: gid102ffd,public
From: Dave Bird---St Hippo of Augustine <new...@xemu.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Naes of ASCII Symbols
Date: 1998/01/16
Message-ID: <OnY...@xemu.demon.co.uk>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 316631375
Distribution: world
X-NNTP-Posting-Host: xemu.demon.co.uk [158.152.196.209]
References: <34A...@ares.informatik.uni-ulm.de> <01bd187e$68352060$LocalHost@atkins> <696gls$p0...@clarknet.clark.net> <Pfz...@sambo.demon.co.uk> <34B...@on.spammer> <EUX...@xemu.demon.co.uk> <01bd1fc5$f180a440$LocalHost@wzngemxl> <69gh0s$d9l$1...@wolfman.xtra.co.nz> <01bd2141$228e8bc0$LocalHost@wzngemxl> <34B...@erols.com>
Organization: 1st Canine Chapel of Bob Dobbs Dog (Church of the SubGenius)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: alt.ascii-art,alt.usage.english,alt.english.usage
About this message. This message was posted publicly to the newsgroup alt.ascii-art in 1998 and is mirrored here unchanged as part of the Historic Archives – only email addresses are masked. The artwork and text belong to their original authors: if you copy a piece, keep the artist's initials or signature intact and credit them where you can. Are you the author? Contact us to get your posts attributed, connected to your artist profile, or removed.

Report this message

Help us keep the archive clean and accurate. Reports are reviewed by a person – nothing is changed automatically.

Help classify this post